UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label peace process. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peace process. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

New Peace Team Bumper Stickers

At this moment of greatest peril to our American democracy, we must demonstrate our detemined opposition to overturn and reverse the monstrous Supreme Court decision giving ANY corporation carte blanche to corrupt our elections.  

And to help spread the word, you can have your choice of either of these two gorgeous new 3" by 11" full 4 color process bumper stickers for no charge, not even shipping!* They are UV coated on premium vinyl for long durability. Just make your selection by going to thee link. One of the bumper stickers is shown below.


If you want BOTH, please make a donation of any amount. And please also make a donation if you CAN in any case, because this is what makes it possible for us send free bumper stickers to anyone who can't make a donation right now.


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 

Netcraft rank: 8549 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Al Jazeera: Gazans share their views on the peace talks

Laila El-Haddad Last Modified: 14 Sep 2010 13:08 GMT


A second round of direct talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority are taking place under the auspices of Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, in Egypt's Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. Washington says it hopes the talks will lead to an agreement within a year.

But Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, are notably absent from the discussions and George Mitchell, the US' Middle East envoy, has said that they will play no role.

Al Jazeera asked Palestinians in Gaza to share their views on the negotiations.

Ola Anan, 25, computer engineer
"When people started to talk about negotiations and going back to the peace process and all, I thought, wait a minute, who took our opinion before going there? I mean, Mahmoud Abbas is now a president who is out of his presidential term. So in whose name is he talking? In the name of Palestinians? I don't think so.

People here in Gaza basically don't have an idea what's going on or about what agenda the Palestinian delegation are going to talk. So we have no interest and we have no news about that. Basically no one took our opinion before going there.

I really doubt how the Americans can trust Mahmoud Abbas as being a representative of the Palestinian people in general.

Or maybe they plan to get the Gaza Strip out of the Palestinian Territories? I don't know."
Nader Nabulsi, 44, shopkeeper
"The negotiations add up to a big zero. They don't belong to us and neither does Abbas. Things are completely rotten. He doesn't recognise the Gaza Strip - so what's he negotiating over? Why doesn't he solve the internal Palestinian problems first and then go negotiate with the Jews? And [Abbas'] term expired long ago. So how can he negotiate? On what basis? The entire Palestinian people need to be consulted in such matters. But taking matters into his own hands, negotiating on his own - that just doesn't work. There has to be a national consensus. He has to take into consideration the opinions of the street and we reject these empty negotiations ... they are a mockery.

Today, Abbas should be talking about creating a new government with legitimacy, one that takes into account the voices of the people, and makes decision with them. He should not just be negotiating on his own volition, based on whatever pops into his head and that of the Ramallah gang's. They say they're for democracy. Well a democracy listens to the parliament, the ministries ... a democracy is not just Abbas making a decision on his own. The Palestinian people are the ones that should decide such matters, not Abbas. We reject these farcical, pointless negotiations."
Amjad Agha, 42, agricultural engineer
"I have no hope in these negotiations. Negotiations have been ongoing for 20 years now and they've brought the Palestinian people nothing at all. Neither the Gaza Strip nor the West Bank has reaped any benefit from them in any way. Both areas are still completely separated from one another - there is no link between these two parts of our nation. Movement across the borders and crossings is still very poor. The airport is closed. There's no freedom of movement.

Gaza in particular is in a large prison. There's absolutely no way to leave, except with extreme difficulty, regardless [of] whether you're a student, you're sick, or you're just a person going on vacation.
These negotiations will fail very quickly, especially given Israel's obstinacy and their staunch refusal to compromise or even speak about the right of return, Jerusalem, and other matters of importance to the Palestinian people and to the Muslim umma."
Sameeha Ulwan, 22, recent college graduate
"I don't think that direct talks mean a lot to me as a Gazan and as a Palestinian as a whole. For us Gazans we are being marginalised and our cause is not being discussed at the direct talks despite the fact that we have [been] besieged in Gaza for more than four years.
And actually direct talks concentrate on the basic issues - those basic issues which have been discussed for decades and which were futile most of the time ... talking about Jerusalem, talking about the refugees, talking about the settlements, which are not going to be frozen according to what the Israelis have been saying. And I don't think those negotiations will lead to anything but more and more concessions."
Khalil Hamam, 54, engineer
"Negotiations have been ongoing for 20 years without any result. This is because there's an asymmetry of power between the two negotiating sides. There's a strong side and a weak side. We don't need negotiations; we just need to fill in the blanks. This is what's causing the disparity. In order for there to be successful negotiations there has to be a balance of power."
Alia Shaheen, 32, project manager at an NGO
"Most of the people here in Gaza aren't even thinking about [negotiations] as they're busy thinking about their current situation, which is worsening. They are thinking about how to solve their problems, their daily difficulties, such as the cutting of electricity, their economic problems, how to get their income, how to raise their children, and about the closure and the siege that they suffer from on a daily basis.  They don't regard negotiations as a big issue in their life overall and certainly not one worth reflecting over. They think of them as a silly activity."
Abu al-Abed, 30, fisherman
"We hear about the negotiations on television, but we don't see them reflected on the ground. They're not feasible.

In the West Bank maybe there are better opportunities.

But Gaza's completely marginalised as far as negotiations go. There's no electricity, there's no water. There's also no movement.

Living expenses are high. And the borders are all closed.

I mean, Gaza's under intense siege."
Salih Ghamri, 58, farmer
"These negotiations surely "neither nourish nor satisfy hunger". They are without substance. They won't get us our rights or anything else for that matter. That's because we're negotiating with someone who's not interested to start with in giving us those rights, someone who doesn't want to compromise on anything to do with the Palestinian cause."

Rightardia considers the peace negotiations without Hamas at the table to be illegitimate.  It is a political 'dog and pony' show that will have little consequence. The Palestinian people know this.


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 

Netcraft rank: 8788
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Monday, November 2, 2009

al Haaretz: America, stop sucking up to Israel

By Gideon Levy
Barack Obama has been busy - offering the Jewish People blessings for Rosh Hashanah, and recording a flattering video for the President's Conference in Jerusalem and another for Yitzhak Rabin's memorial rally.

In all the videos, Obama heaps sticky-sweet praise on Israel, even though he has spent nearly a year fruitlessly lobbying for Israel to  temporarily freeze on settlement building - to advance the peace process.

The president's Mideast envoy, George Mitchell, has also been busy, shuttling between a funeral (for IDF soldier Asaf Ramon, the son of Israel's first astronaut Ilan Ramon) and a memorial (for Rabin, though it was postponed until next week due to rain), in order to find favor with Israelis.
Polls have shown that Obama is increasingly unpopular here, with an approval rating of only 6 to 10 percent. In the US, however, two of three Jewish Americans support the president.

Before no other country on the planet does the United States kneel and plead like this. In other trouble spots, America takes a different tone. It bombs in Afghanistan, invades Iraq and threatens sanctions against Iran and North Korea. Did anyone in Washington consider begging Saddam Hussein to withdraw from occupied territory in Kuwait?

But Israel the occupier, the stubborn contrarian that continues to mock America and the world by building settlements and abusing the Palestinians, receives different treatment. Another massage to the national ego in one video, more embarrassing praise in another.

Now is the time to say to the United States: Enough flattery. If you don't change the tone, nothing will change. As long as Israel feels the United States is in its pocket, and that America's automatic veto will save it from condemnations and sanctions, that it will receive massive aid unconditionally, and that it can continue waging punitive, lethal campaigns without a word from Washington. It will continue to kill, destroy and imprison without the world's policeman making a sound; it will continue in its ways.

Illegal acts like the occupation and settlement expansion, and offensives that may have involved war crimes, as in Gaza, deserve a different approach.

If America and the world had issued condemnations after Operation Summer Rains in 2006 - which left 400 Palestinians dead and severe infrastructure damage in the first major operation in Gaza since the disengagement - then Operation Cast Lead never would have been launched.

It is true that unlike all the world's other troublemakers, Israel is viewed as a Western democracy, but Israel of 2009 is a country whose language is force.
Anwar Sadat may have been the last leader to win our hearts with optimistic, hope-igniting speeches. If he were to visit Israel today, he would be jeered off the stage. The Syrian president pleads for peace and Israel callously dismisses him, the United States begs for a settlement freeze and Israel turns up its nose. This is what happens when there are no consequences for Israel's inaction.

When Hillary Clinton returns to Washington, she should advocate a sharp policy change toward Israel. Israeli hearts can no longer be won with hope, promises of a better future or sweet talk, for this is no longer Israel's language. For something to change, Israel must understand that perpetuating the status quo will exact a painful price.

Actually all Hillary did was compliment Benjamin Netanyahu for making concessions on the West Bank settlements.“What the Prime Minister has offered in specifics of a restraint on the policy of settlements . . . is unprecedented,” Mrs Clinton said.

She did not give details of the concessions. Under the Oslo peace talks in the 1990s Israel has never halted the expansion of settlements. The Palestinians have withdrawn form the peace Talks because the Isralis will not freeze the expansion of its settlements.
Mahmoud Abbas is expected to resign as leader of Palestine. Under intense pressure form the US, Abbas withdrew his support for the recommendations in the Goldstone Report that would have guaranteed its appearance before the Security Council of the United Nations. This was not in Palestine's self-interest.
Israel of 2009 is a spoiled country, arrogant and condescending, convinced that it deserves everything and that it has the power to make a fool of America and the world.
The United States has engendered this situation, which endangers the entire Mideast and Israel itself. That is why there needs to be a turning point in the coming year - Washington needs to finally say no to Israel and the occupation. An unambiguous, presidential no.

source: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1124928.html

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 6264 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
Powered by ScribeFire.