UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label VA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VA. Show all posts

Thursday, August 6, 2015

You have physcian options with Veteran Affairs (VA).

When you get a medical appointment with the VA, you go to a VA Medical Center (VAMC) or a Community-Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) or clinic.

You may be seen by a physician, a physician assistant (PA) or  a nurse practitioner (NP). All three are collectively referred to as clinicians.

Suppose you get a bad clinician. I hear about complaints about "doctors" all he time on the Internet. Of course, the bad doctor may a PA or an NP because the VA has a huge shortage of physicians. In fact, VA secretary, Bob McDonald, wants to hire 28,000 for physicians.

Bad doctors are not unique to the VA. In the past 7 years, I changed private practice endocrinologists twice and neurologists once. You can often go on the Internet to find information on physicians, PAs and NPs.  You can also subscribe to Angie's List and pay an extra fee to get patient ratings of people and institutions in the medical community.

If you get a bad  VA clinician , what can to do? You can contact the Patient's Advocate office and ask for a new physician. Make it clear you want a physician, and not a PA or NP.

If the second physician is also problematic, then go back to Patient Advocates Office and file another complaint.

This time a patient affairs is supposed to assign a private practice physician to provide medical care.

Hopefully your third attempt for medical care will be successful.

By the way, the CBOCs or clinics often have many of the functions that a VAMC has. For example. the Palm Harbor CBOC has both Patient Advocate and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) offices.






Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

  Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Be careful when buying an older home




Older homes can offer a lot of amenities such as established yard, better bones (construction) and architectural details that you will no longer find in more contemporary homes. However, these homes can also have many hidden problems.

Some of the key problems

1.leaky basements which are generally not a problem in Florida because few homes have basements.
2. crumbling foundations. An expensive proposition to fix.
3. ancient galvanized plumbing, cast iron interior sewage pipes and ceramic sewage pipes in your yard will have to be replaced.
4. lead paint in both interior and exterior walls.
5. knob and tube electrical. If you have to make any changes to the electrical system your home, all of the knob and tube wiring will have to be removed and replaced. Another expensive proposition. Your fuse box will have to replaced with a breaker box, too.
6. Asbestos in insulation, roofing tiles, siding, and floor tiles. A special abatement team will have to come into your home to remove any asbestos.
7. Termites. Subterranean are easy to control but dry wood termites require the home be tented and fumigated with poison gas. Fortunately, this is the seller's responsibility.

Basement problems can easily cost $30K or more to fix. Sometimes French drains and sump pumps will do the job. In other cases basement walls that have shifted may have to be reinforced with steel beams. Basement renovations(reno) can also be expensive because the furnace and water lines have to be moved as well as as sewage lines and the ventilation system for heating and cooling. In general, trying to add usable living space in the basement of an older home is a bad idea.
Foundation problems can also be a huge problem in older homes. Carry some marbles and drop them on floors to see how true they are. Check the foundation, walls and ceiling for large cracks.. Sometimes cracks in flooring will only be apparent when the carpet is pulled up.

In the case of a wood frame house, the home may have to be jacked up to replace rotting foundation timbers.

Older homes use galvanized plumbing and cast iron interior sewage pipes. All will probably have to be replaced in an aged home. The ceramic pipes exiting the home will cost $2 thousand or more to replace. Tree roots penetrate these sewage pipes over time.

Older homes built between the 1860s and 1940s used knob and tube wiring. This is a two wire system with no ground wire. It uses insulators in the walls and ceramic tubes as insulators when wires have to be pulled through studs.

One of shows on HGTV had a house built in the 1950s that had knob and tube wiring. Knob and tube is safe as long as you don't need to upgrade electrical service in you home.

If you need to upgrade your home's electrical service, your home will have to be completely rewired. The old fuse box will have to be replaced with an upgraded circuit breaker box with more capacity.

In a worse case scenario, all of the interior plaster in your home might have to be removed to upgrade the plumbing, sewage and electrical lines. The plaster will be replaced with dry wall.

Lead paint has been banned from household paints in the United States since 1978. Have your house checked for lead before you buy. ,

Houses built between 1930 and 1950 may also have asbestos as insulation. Asbestos was used in textured paint and in patching compounds used on both wall and ceiling joints until 1977.

Get an older home thoroughly checked out. The plumbing, sewage pipes and electrical must be in working order. Make sure the electrical and water is on for the inspector.

Find out what the local code requirements are for knob and tube wiring. The inspector should be able to test for lead paint, but probably not identify any interior asbestos issues.
Asbestos might be discovered during a major reno in a kitchen when a wall is opened up.

It's best not to open a wall in an older home unless necessary Likewise, think twice about expanding living areas into basements. Basements can eat up most of the reno budget, Get the kitchen and bathrooms and living areas updated before you tackle a basement.

One other tip: finance through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) if you can. The government has more stringent requirements for underwriting a home than a conventional lender.

For example, The roof under FHA guidelines should have a remaining physical life of at least two years. VA inspectors will also check for lead paint.
sources:




Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

  Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

Veteran Affairs Dependent Indemnity Compensation


The Veteran Affairs Dependent Indemnity Compensation (DIC) program works like this. If a veteran has service-connected disability and dies from that particular disability, he widow, widower or parents may be eligible for DIC compensation.

There are many ifs, and and buts. For example, if the surviving spouse receives compensation under the Department of Defense Survivor Benefit Program (SBP), the DIC benefits usually become a tax offset. You cannot normally get both SPB entitlements and DIC benefits.

If the surviving spouse remarries, DIC benefits may be terminated at the date of that marriage. In addition, parents of a decreased veteran my be able to receive DIC benefits,but there are income restrictions.

"A surviving spouse who remarries on or after December 16, 2003, and on or after attaining age 57, is entitled to continue to receive DIC."


Social Security has no offsets for compensation or pensions received from the VA. One person who contacted the writer is saying that the VA has a means test for DIC, but the writer  was not able to find any information on means tests except for parent's applying for DIC.

As mentioned earlier, there are DIC offsets for spouses  who receive entitlements from SBP as the spouses of deceased retired vets from the armed services.

Likewise, if a spouse receives DIC and remarries, the DIC benefits will terminate in certain circumstances.

Now that gay couples can marry in the majority of US states, these couple need to aware that a gay marriage could result in the termination of DIC.

This is a complex area and survivors are encourage to contact counselors in VA veteran centers, veteran service officers or attorneys for assistance. To see more:

http://benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/types-dependency_and_indemnity.asp

http://www.military.com/benefits/survivor-benefits/dependency-and-indemnity-compensation.html

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

  Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Friday, August 29, 2014

The Veterans Administration and McKinsey and Company

You have probably never heard of McKinney and Company.  It is a very large NYC based consulting firm and also very secretive. it is one of the hardest companies in the US to interview because of corporate secrecy.

It provides consulting services to both medical insurers and government organizations. One of its customer is the Veterans Administration and many high level VA and other agency employees have worked for this corporation. 

That would be people like Bob McDonald, the new VA secretary. Beth Cobert is the new deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget.  Tommy Sowers, who oversees the public affairs office and other vital programs for the Department of Veterans Affairs, was a former McKinsey consultant.


McKinsey & Company desires a “very low profile public image.” It has a policy against discussing specific client situations and does not advertise. Members are not supposed to “sell” their services following attorney and accountant traditions from the early 1900s, 

MicKinsey does have medical insurance clients both in the private and public sectors. Many of these corporations practice  the three D's of  insurance claims: "deny, delay and defend" against them. 

If you have  submitted a VA claim, you might begin to understand why the average claim takes about 4.5 years. You might also understand why only 10-11 per cent of claims are appealed. People simply give up.

If you are fortunate enough to prevail in a claim, you will probably run into the fallback gambit;  a low ball rating that does not conform to the disability schedule in 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part C.

The VA was established as a charitable organization during the Revolutionary War and greatly expanded  after the Civil War. Claims are supposed to be considered in a non-adversarial fashion. 

Enter McKinsey and Company. 

A 1993 profile story in Fortune Magazine said McKinsey & Company was “the most well-known, most secretive, most high-priced, most prestigious, most consistently successful, most envied, most trusted, most disliked management consulting firm on earth.

According to BusinessWeek the firm is "ridiculed, reviled, or revered . . ." 
The Wall Street Journal said McKinsey is seen as “elite, loyal and secretive" while The News Observer said McKinsey's internal culture was “collegiate and ruthlessly competitive” and sometimes described as arrogant.

Why would an elite company like McKinsey and company, who competes with Mitt Romney's Bain and Company, be involved in the VA? First of all, medical insurance is big business. According to McKinsey the average US household, spends more annually on health insurance than on its home mortgage.
The VA is one of McKinsey's success stories. Or is it?


[It] helped reorganized the Veterans’ Health Administration into 21 networks, each with accountable clinical leadership, across the United States. The program also introduced clinically relevant performance measures, with corresponding rewards, and new information systems, including one for electronic medical records. The VA soon became a leader in clinical quality: for example, the risk of death for men over 65 in the VA’s care is 40 percent lower than the US average. The satisfaction level of patients rose to 83 percent, 12 percent above the national average . . .

However, the new information systems never really worked, a problem that is still plaguing the VA today.  Likewise, the VA needed more major reforms in the 1995-2000 period. 

[T]he Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented universal primary care, closed 55% of their acute care hospital beds, increased patient treatments by 24%, had a 48% increase in ambulatory care visits, and decreased staffing by 12%. By 2000, the VHA had 10,000 fewer employees than in 1995 and a 104% increase in patients treated since 1995, and had managed to maintain the same cost per patient-day . . .

Does the VA need corporate sharks as consultants? That is the question. 

Certainly the record of McKinsey and Company has not been perfect. McKinsey had advised a large IT corporation that cell phones would be a niche technology. IT does not appear to be the company's strong suit.

In addition, several civil suits have been filed against home insurance and vehicle insurance companies after the insurers were advised by McKinsey, to allegedly low ball insurees for actual value of the property damage.

McKinsey was cited in a February 2007 CNN article for developing controversial car insurance practices that State Farm and Allstate used in the mid-1990s to avoid paying claims involving soft tissue injury.


State Farm and Allstate  are two of the worst companies in the US for paying medical insurance claims and are well known for their three D tactics.

These are tactics that should not be used by the VA. Or for that matter, in government at all.

sources:

















Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

  Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Prologue to filing a VA claim


Rightardia has written many articles on filing a successful claim.The major learned a lot though trial and error. 

Here are some of the key lessons the major learned. 


1. It will be very hard to prevail in a claim at the VARO without private practice physicians supporting you claim unless you have a presumptive type of condition. Minimally you will need a general practitioner (GP) and one specialist. In the major's claim, he had extensive correspondence from his GP and 5 specialists.
Recommendation: Enroll in ACA if you do not have private practice insurance.

2. Do a lot of upfront work before you file. Have your physicians sign Disability Benefits Questionnaires and get all you ducks in a row. Indicate you are filing a fully developed claim (FDC). This means once you file, you do not plan to submit additional documentation. The DBQ provides considerably more information to the VA than most letters, Make sure you include a nexus statement in the DBQ that ties your disability to you military service. Make sure the doctor indicates he reviewed you service medical records (SMR) on the DBQ, too.
Recommendation: Fill out a DBQ and use DBQs as evidence, Letters should be used a backup.

3. You can have a veteran service officer represent you, an attorney, or you can represent yourself pro se. The major was not greatly impressed with VSOs at the regional office. In general, contacting an attorney prior of submitting a claim seems premature with the advent of the DBQ. 

A Federal Circuit panel noted that its prior decisions in Moody v. Principi, Szemraj v. Principi, and Roberson v. Principi made it clear that pro se filings must be read liberally. All three cases require the VA "to fully and sympathetically develop the veteran's claim to its optimum before deciding it on the merits."

As a vet you get an extra benefit of the doubt filing pro se.
Recommendation: Initiate  your claim pro se.

If the VA denies or low balls your claim, appeal it to the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA).  You may wish to engage at attorney at this point because the BVA hearing is quasi-legal and USC Code 38 and the 38 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) now apply. In many states, VSO's are not required to have legal training. The VSO understand VA directives such as M21-1MR, but not USC codes used by the BVA.
Recommendation: Hire an attorney if you appeal to the BVA.

Since you filed an FDC, you should save any new evidence until then and introduce it at at the BVA level. In fact, the BVA wants new evidence. In addition, if you are unhappy with the BVA decision and appeal to the next level, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims (USCAVC), the evidence is frozen. You cannot introduce new evidence to the USCAVC. 
Recommendation: Submit new evidence when you appeal to the BVA. That may be you last opportunity to introduce new evidence. 

Other comments: Try to organize your claims  in terms of primary and secondary conditions. For example if you served in Vietnam and developed Diabetes Mellitus II from Agent orange exposure, you may also have coronary artery disease, pericarditus and other secondary conditions.

Recently heard about an officer who applied for more than 30 conditions. The VA refers to this as piling on. This approach is a waste of your time and the VA's

A claimant is better off  perusing the 38 CFR disability criteria and identifying the more important disabilities. The VA ha a peculiar way of determining you total disability rating and numerous 10 per cent rating aren't useful.

However,  60 per cent primary disability with multiple secondary ratings is a different story

sources:

http://blogs.findlaw.com/federal_circuit/2013/01/pro-se-veterans-filings-must-be-read-liberally.html

http://www.vetshome.com/diabetes_claims_secondary.htm

http://www.benefits.va.gov/warms/bookc.asp



Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 
  Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Saturday, December 7, 2013

What a vet needs to have before they start a pro se claim.




Rightardia recommends vets file a pro se claim because we think most service organizations like he DAV and AmVets offer little value added. The average Veteran Service Officer (VSO) supports 300 claimants

If you file pro se , you also get any extra benefit of the doubt. If you opt for pro se, the VARO has to give your claim an extra benefit of the doubt because you are not using a service organization. 

Before you file

1. The vet needs a PC. Older PCs of Pentium 4 vintage and later run find with Linux. You can get one of these older PCs from Goodwill for $50. You also have Libre office (Open Office) for word precessing and Draw which can edit Acrobat document with such as Disability Benefits Questionnaires (DBQ). Use Libre Writer to paste text into the Draw document. All the major browsers except Internet Explorer work in Linux. See http://voices.yahoo.com/using-openoffice-edit-pdf-files-6153998.html

2. An Internet connection. Of course, claims can also be submitted using the Internet at the library.

3. A laser printer, multi-function printer (MFC) fax, copier and scanner. Laser printer are cheaper in the long run than dot matrix and also print a lot faster.
4. Read two books: Claim Denied!: How to Appeal a VA Denial of Benefits [Paperback]
John D. Roche and Veterans Administration Claims: What You Need to Know to Be Successful, hardcover by Asknod.

5. You will need your service medical records (SMR) and DD From 214, Statement of Service, to file a claim. You can order those on theEbenefits web site, but you need a premier DSLogin (ID and password) first.
6. Before you begin. Peruse 38 CFR, part C and try to find the disability codes that fit your conditions.

7. Take a close look at the policy in the 38 CR and the supplements. You need to understand VA concepts such as a bilateral rating and pyramiding.

8. How to organize the narrative of your claim. Peruse 38 CFR. Part c and try to determine what system(s) you disability falls into such as skeletal, respiratory, digestive and so forth. Is there any relationship between the conditions? For examples if you were exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam, you may have type II diabetes. You may also have some of these other secondary conditions.: Peripheral Artery Disease Ischemic Heart Disease, Carotid Artery Disease Stroke , Kidney Disease  Hypertension  and Diseases of the Eye. Can you relate your conditions in terms of primary and secondary conditions?

Another example if you contacted meningitis or encephalitis while in the service, you may have damage to the brain and brain stem and suffer from tinnitus, hearing loss, and sleep apnea. The latter conditions are secondary to encephalitis. Try to find pages in your SMRs that directly relate to your claim. Use those pages as attachments to submit a fully developed claim.

Develop a team of doctors who are you advocates. Minimally I would suggest one primary care doctor and one specialist. Make sure both are board certified and have reviewed your SMRs. They can also review your VA records you can get using Blue Dot downloads from MyHealthEvet. You need premium DS Login first to create a second login to My HealthEvet. Interview the doctor and ask them if they will help you with letters and disability benefit questionnaires. If he or she won't, find another doctor. 

Format for filing the claim

This is how I would recommend you structure the narrative in the VA Form 21-526

Note: VA Forms 21-526, 21-686c, and 21-4138 are no longer available for use and submission in the Veterans Online Application (VONAPP). The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from VONAPP to a new online VA claim service known as VONAPP Direct Connect (VDC) for all Compensation claims, which is currently available for use in eBenefits. 

Purpose: Award claimant a 60 disability for PTSD. (Here ask for what is based on the tables in the 38 CFR, Part C. Make sure any letter or DBQs you have from your doctors are in agreement.

Facts: Describe how you medical condition is service connected and provide a time line of the events while you were in the service. Avoid any opinions or conjecture here.

Discussion: You can discuss how the primary and secondary conditions relate and how his condition has affected your life. Letters from service buddies and employers should be used as attachment if you lack SMRs. Try to link all of your attachments to statements and in the facts and the discussion, e.g., the claimant contacted Hepatitis C in Saigon and was hospitalized for 3 months for the condition (atch 4).

Conclusion:
1. The claim for meningitis is service connected.
2. The meningitis caused the secondary condition of sleep apnea, tinnitus and hearing loss. See the letters and DBQs at attach 7, 8 and 9.

Recommendation: Award the claimant a 100 per cent disability go the primary condition of cirrhosis and the residual secondary condition Hepatitis C.

You can use this same Format on a Form 9 for a VA appeal. It's a good idea to get additional doctor's letter, progress notes and DBQs for the BVA appeal. 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

  Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Saturday, November 23, 2013

So you think you are entitled to a VA disability


You may have a service connected condition that should be compensated, but do you have the staff and writing skills to get the job done? 

You can submit doctor's letter, doctor's progress notes an Disability Benefits Questionnaires (DBQ) as documentation. Rightardia recommends using the DBQ whenever possible.

You may want to write a draft letter for the doctors consideration that uses VA terminology. For example, the VA wants to to see a medical conditions as more likely than not service connected.

Many vets make the mistake of trying to get compensated for every malady they have. Rightrdia has read the average vet files 20 claims. Now if you are filing for hearing loss, bursitis, diabetes melllitis, a back condition, flat feet, knee damage and other unrelated conditions, its like throwing mud balls against a wall and hoping some will stick.

The VA has a term for this: piling on. 

It's much better to file with primary conditions relating to secondary. For example, if you caught St. Louis encephalitis while in the service, you may be able relate that to the secondary conditions of high or low frequency hearing loss, tinnitus, and complex sleep apnea. In this case you are filing for one primary condition and three secondary related conditions.

Peruse the Disability Conditions (DC) in 38 CFR, Part 3 before you file. Don't waste time filing for three 10 per cent conditions when you may meet the 30 per cent criteria for sleep apnea. 

The trick is to tie your medical conditions to your service military records (SMR). Here you will need doctors opinions. You want board certified physicians on you team and you must indicate the doctors have reviewed your SMRs. You may have to go the the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA) to get some of your conditions service connected.

Her is a sample letter you can use as a template.


Tampa Bay Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx
address
City and zip code
Phone:
Fax:

To: Whom it May Concern:                                                                    date:

re:

I am Mr/Ms ___________'s primary care physician and he/she has been a patient here for several years. I have reviewed his military service records.

Mr/Ms ________ contacted _______________________________ on (date). A subsequent MRI indicated he had an _______________. After further testing he was diagnosed with ________________ with the related (secondary ) conditions of _____________________________.

The __________(primary condition)_________ was the likely causal factor in the related secondary conditions of _________, _______________ and ______________.

In addition, the ___(primary condition) ___ can lead to _______________. He also has chronic ______________ outbreaks and takes ________________ as required that I prescribe for him.

Mr/Ms ___________________ was hospitalized at _______________ in (date) for an ____________________ and he suffered a _______________ while he was in the hospital.

I receive correspondence from a team of doctors that care for Mr/Ms _________ on a recurring basis: an endocrinologist, a neurologist, a cardiologist, an otolaryngologist, an ENT and a urologist. He undergoes extensive blood lab work for his _________________ every 90-days.

Mr/Ms ___________________ has not worked for many years and his multiple medical disabilities are permanent and chronic. He/She is disabled, immuno-supressed, vulnerable to infection and to another ________________.

His condition had deteriorated after the last hospitalization that more likely than not caused his/her ___________. He has no prospects for improvement.

He is permanently and totally disabled. He has near constant debilitating symptoms from the ____________. In particular, the __________________ would preclude employment.

Sincerely,


(signed)

Nnnnnn Nnnnn, M.D.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

  Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Prologue to a Veteran Affairs Claim


After nearly six years,  a VA claim was resolved to the major's satisfaction. This was after a Decision Review Officer review, a reconsideration and two remands, working on the third.

What did the major learn along the way?

In the long run, you may be better off pro se than using a service organization like the DAV or AMVETS. However,you will have to read some books first, be computer literate and also have an Internet connection. If you are not inclined to do the preceding, use one of the service organizations.

If you opt for pros se, the VARO has to give your claim an extra benefit of the doubt because you are not using a service organization.  Before you file, read these two books:

1. Veterans Administration Claims: What You Need to Know to Be Successful by Asknod.

2, Claim Denied!: How to Appeal a VA Denial of Benefits [Paperback] John D. Roche

You can purchase both books together for $32.05 from Amazon.com. Asknod also has a great blog: https://asknod.wordpress.com/

There are also numerous articles on the disability claim process in the Rightardia blog.

If you decide to go pro se, you will also need above average writing skills. You might want to test your writing skills to see where you are at: see http://www.evc-cit.info/wst/

You can use either MS Word or Libre office (Open Office) to prepare claims documentation. If you use the latter, install the Language Tool add on which provides a grammar checker that is equivalent to the one in MS Word.

When you are ready, you can file the initial claim online, using VONAPP: http://vabenefits.vba.va.gov/vonapp.

In most cases, would not recommend doing this until you have your service military records (SMR) on hand. See http://www.archives.gov/veterans/military-service-records/

Why? Because the claim will be weak and unsubstantiated without documentation from you military service  records.

If you cannot document your condition with evidence that is in your military service records, you are not likely to be successful with your claim.

Ir should be clear by now why being computer literate with an Internet connection is essential for a pro se claim.

However, you should also have Disability Benefits Questionnaires (DBQ) prepared by your doctors.The DBQ is a new innovation that should expedite he claim. A mix of doctors letters and DBQs will help make the case. See http://benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/dbq_ListByDBQFormName.asp


The VA DBQs are Acrobat pdf files which can be filled out and printed, but not saved.

The major spent about $100 on a program called PDF Nitro. It allows a user to edit, save and even compile Acrobat documents. You can also convert the documents into Word and Excel docs. If you plan to submit DBQs, you will need a program like this.

Assembling your team of physicians

Many doctors are conservative and view the VA as an unnecessary welfare program. Interview a new doctor and feel them out on their willingness to help. If they won't,  find another doctor. You will need doctors who are your advocate.  You will need a primary care doctor and one or more specialists. You want all of them to be board certified.

You also wants the physicians to indicate they have reviewed your SMRs in any letters or DBQs.

The major's team included a primary care doctor, a cardiologist, a neurologist, a psychologist and an endocrinologist. During the claim, he replaced two endocrinologists and one neurologist.

You can mail in a DBQ and the doctor's letter to the VA. Another way is to take the documents to the nearest VARO Veteran Center. The vet center will add the submission to your claim file (c-file) and put a date time stamp on it. You can also talk to a VA counselor while you are there.
Watch out for Compensation and Pension clinicians. 

Once you have submitted the claim, you may be scheduled for a compensation and pension (C&P) exams. Many of the C&P examiners are not doctors, but Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners. Rightardia suggests you insist upon a doctor if C&P calls you.

Regardless of who performs the exam, you can expect to be damned with faint praise. Unfortunately, the Ratings Veterans Services Representative (RVSR) in the VARO will consider the C&P clinician's opinion above that of your physicians

The RVSR is a primary decision maker of the outcome of your claim for VA disability compensation benefits. However, if you have provided compelling evidence in a DBQ, it may preclude a C&P exam. Try to avoid a C&P exam if at all possible. These clinicians are not your friend.

Originally, the C&P doctors we authorized to assist people who lacked medical care. Now, the VA tires to use them to see all vets with claims The DAV indicates DBQ may preclude a C&P exam. This is another reason to use a DBQ.

If you get a bad C&P exam, you have some options. You can get the C&P progress notes after the exam from the FOIA office and write a rebuttal. Errors of commission are not common, but errors of omission are very likely. Write a rebuttal and submit it to the service center.

You can also Rizzo the physician and challenge his or her credentials if the C&P exam is really substandard . You can do this years before a BVA appeal and if the VARO forgets to defend the physician's credentials, his or her physical or progress notes cannot be used in the BVA decision.

The first time the major rizzoed a C&P physician, the VARO asked him if he wanted to be serviced at another hospital. This was baloney because the C&P doctors are not part of the local VA Medical Center. In addition the local VARO supported both hospitals so it would have been pointless to change hospitals.

See http://rightardia.blogspot.com/2010/07/precendent-setting-cavc-cases-that-may.html

Although the RVSRs give primary consideration to the C&P physicians, the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA) will be far more impressed with the opinion of your board certified physicians. especially if the doctors have reviewed your SMRs, 

Although the VA is now claiming that 70 per cent of its claims are approved, most of the data the major has seen suggests that even after an appeal to the BVA, about 30 per cent of the claims are approved, 

It is likely the initial claim will not be approved by the VARO. if you have a well grounded claim, appeal to the BVA for a review by an administrative law judge.

The law judge has very different perspective than RSVRS who use a VA directive. The law judges considers the VA law in USC 38. These judges are also aware of the US Court of Veteran Appeals (USCAVC) precedent rulings that the VAROs usually ignore


The BVA may declare a condition the VARO has denied as service connected. This will result in a remand that will force the VARO to rate a condition it previously denied.

You may want to engage an attorney to represent you during the BVA hearing. Be aware the attorney will receive 20 per cent of any subsequent award.

One of the favorite ploys of a VARO is to say a claimant has not provided new evidence. The major suggests you can get new evidence whenever you visit one of you doctors. Although you may want to give the VA access to your doctor's records in the initial stages of a claim, in the long run this is a bad idea because your c-file will get huge. You also want to filter any data first that goes to the VARO.

It's better to get the progress notes after a visit, review the notes and the carry the relevant notes to the vet center. When the major finally received a Statement of Case, he had references in it to three pages of his documentation.

So document, document and document! 

Is summary, consider going pros se on the claim because you will have a better chance of your claim succeeding. You will need to be computer literate with Internet access. if you are not, use one of the service organizations like the DAV.

Assemble a strong team of physicians who are your advocates. If a doctor won't help you, find one who will.

Use DBQs, doctor's letters and progress notes to document you condition.  Make sure you board certified physicians review your SMRs and document this in your DBQs or letters, 

Expect to have the claim denied by the VARO.  If the claim is well documented, appeal to the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA). Consider hiring an attorney to represent you in the BVA hearing. The judge is attorney and the VA also has an attorney consul at the hearing.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

 Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Why the VA sucks

I posted the initial article on the FB page, "The VA is lying."

The VA approves about 15 per cent of its claims overall. If you appeal to the BVA and prevail, about 30 per cent of VA claims make the cut.

If you appeal the BVA ruling to the USCAVC, about 70 per cent of those filings are overturned.. However, only a small percentage of vets who lose a BVA appeal, go to the USCAVC.

About 15 per cent of VA are fraudulent. This means when the dust clears, about 55 per cent of vets just give up. Perhaps the claim is poorly written or lacks appropriate medical documentation. Most vets just tire of the run-around.

If the VA makes an award, the award comes out of the local VA claims office's (VARO) hide. This is really a conflict of interest and may explain why the VA is so stingy.

About 40-45 percent of claims from Iraq and Afghan vets are being approved. Not bad.

However, if you are Vietnam era vet, it's about 2-4 per cent.

Is this a dual standard for vets? You betcha!
Essentially if 100 vets were to file claims, about 20 would be approved at the the VA Regional Office (VARO) level. If you are an Iraq and Afghan vet, a Purple Heart recipient, paralyzed or paraplegic, your odds improve. 
If you appeal to the Decision Review Officer (DRO) or the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA), another 20 per cent of those appellants get approved. 
Keep in mind the DRO is bound by it VA Manual, M21-1. It does not consider precedent rulings from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims (USCAVC) , the 38 CFR that is the VA directive or 38 USC that is public law.
The BVA will consider USCAVC precedent rulings that require a three panel judge, 38CFR and 38 USC. The BVA is legal administrative proceeding. the BVA will also consider the opinions of private practice physicians in letters and Disability Benefit Questionnaires. 
The VARO will gloss over private practice evidence if it conflicts with the Compensation and Pension (C&P) clinicians findings. Keep in mind that many of the C&P examiners are nurse practitioners and physician assistants. A board certified physician will hold more weight in front of the BVA. 
Make sure your key physicians have conducted record reviews of you military service records. This is important to the BVA.
However, the DRO or BVA base is smaller. Let's says that 50 of the 80 claimants who were rejected appeal. Only 10 would prevail at the DRO or BVA. At this point about 30 per cent of the claims have been approved. However, the BVA may only approve one of your 4 claims and remand the other three back to the VARO for development.
You are now playing remand ping pong with the your other three claims. 
We now have 40 claimants left who didn't make the cut at the DRO or BVA. These appellants can apeal to the USCAVC. If 10 appeal, about seven will prevail. 
These examples are hypothetical and based on limited data the VA has provided on claims. Much of this information was harvested from congressional testimony.
Of the 33 remaining claimants. about half (15) are fraudulent. If you file a fraudulent claim, you will most likely receive a quick reject. You can also be prosecuted.
It behooves the vet to appeal if he/she have a well grounded claim. The writer recently discovered he was very fortunate to prevail in front of the BVA without an attorney. Generally, once you get into appeals, you should probably hire an attorney. 
Refine your claim based on the attorney's advice and bring in new substantial evidence at the DRO and BVA levels, 
Once you appeal to the USCAVC, the claim is locked. You cannot introduce new evidence.
What do these statistics suggest. Appeal, young person, appeal!
Your odds of winning are highest at the USCAVC level, but you better have a solid claim. You cannot introduce new evidence once the BVA hearing is over. 
graphics: courtesy of AskNod blog.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 
 Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Huffington Post : Eric Shinseki, VA Chief, Charts Solid Gains For Veterans



Eric Shinseki indicates he VA backlog will be cleared up next year.

One of the big VA innovations is the disability benefit questionable (DBQ). See http://benefits.va.gov/TRANSFORMATION/dbqs/ListByDBQFormName.asp

The VA is a planning to use the DBQ in lieu of the C & P exam according to a Disabled American Veterans source at the Bay Pines. The DBQ will be used in lieu of the Compensation and Pension (C&P) exams.

Rightardia has been a big critic of these exams. The C&P doctors were authorized to evaluate vets who didn't have insurance. In the past most vets were required to take these exams if they filed a claim.

Rightardia has found these exams to be superficial and the exams often contain errors of both commission and omission. To make matters worse, the VA clams examiners usually put more weight on the C&P exams than on private physician letters and DBQs.

Rightardia is elated that the DBQ will eliminate the need for many C&P exams. This wills save taxpayer money.

Eric Shinseki, VA Chief, Charts Solid Gains For Veterans:

'via Blog this' Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA Creative Commons License Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Paul Ryan budget ignores the Veterans Adminstration


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
This is hard to believe because Veterans Administration programs are supposed to be immune to budget cuts in the out years.

If you are a vet and undecided who to vote for, this should help. Obama considers veterans programs a "sacred duty."

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.