You should also formally challenge the C&P doctors credentials according to a recent CAVC Rizzo v.
Shinseki court ruling. Please check the jimstrickland912.com blog used as the source. It contains several precedent setting rulings that could affect you particular claim.
November
16th 2009
The Case For Review:
Case: Rizzo v. Shinseki, CAVC No. 07-0123; Fed. Cir. No. 2009-7026
BVA Decision: October 13, 2006
CAVC Decision: August 26, 2008
Fed. Cir. Decision: September 8, 2009
Key Issue(s):
(1) Whether the VA has to produce some evidence of the qualifications and expertise of a VA physician who submits an opinion that the Board relies on in denying a claim.
(2) Whether the veteran received due process when his claim was repeatedly denied with an altered medical document in the claims file.
Law: 38 U.S.C. § 5103A; Federal Rules of Evidence
What was decided:
(1) The Court decided that unless a veteran challenges the expertise of a VA physician or other witness, VA is not required to present any evidence of the qualifications of that person.
(2) A VA official’s position in the government allows VA and the courts to assume that the official does his job correctly unless there is clear evidence otherwise.
What this means to veterans:
Veterans have little, if any, say in which physicians or other persons VA assigns to perform examinations and submit opinions on the veteran’s claim. This case makes very clear that to question or challenge the expertise of the VA person submitting evidence, a veteran must raise the a challenge at the regional office or Board level. Waiting until an appeal to the Veterans Court is too late and VA will be able to assume the individual is an expert and did everything correctly.
As a practical matter, a challenge to the education, knowledge, experience, or training of a VA “expert” should
(1) be in writing;
(2) submitted to the regional office or Board;
(3) clearly state that the veteran is challenging the expertise of the individual to provide evidence in the case;
and
(4) request “affirmative evidence” that establishes the individual’s competence and qualifications to provide the expert evidence submitted.
The veteran should also describe the reasons for questioning the individual’s expertise, such as, little or no experience with the veteran’s condition, an incomplete examination, errors in the examination report, specific statements made by the individual or other raising doubts about the individual’s expertise.
The Case For Review:
Case: Rizzo v. Shinseki, CAVC No. 07-0123; Fed. Cir. No. 2009-7026
BVA Decision: October 13, 2006
CAVC Decision: August 26, 2008
Fed. Cir. Decision: September 8, 2009
Key Issue(s):
(1) Whether the VA has to produce some evidence of the qualifications and expertise of a VA physician who submits an opinion that the Board relies on in denying a claim.
(2) Whether the veteran received due process when his claim was repeatedly denied with an altered medical document in the claims file.
Law: 38 U.S.C. § 5103A; Federal Rules of Evidence
What was decided:
(1) The Court decided that unless a veteran challenges the expertise of a VA physician or other witness, VA is not required to present any evidence of the qualifications of that person.
(2) A VA official’s position in the government allows VA and the courts to assume that the official does his job correctly unless there is clear evidence otherwise.
What this means to veterans:
Veterans have little, if any, say in which physicians or other persons VA assigns to perform examinations and submit opinions on the veteran’s claim. This case makes very clear that to question or challenge the expertise of the VA person submitting evidence, a veteran must raise the a challenge at the regional office or Board level. Waiting until an appeal to the Veterans Court is too late and VA will be able to assume the individual is an expert and did everything correctly.
As a practical matter, a challenge to the education, knowledge, experience, or training of a VA “expert” should
(1) be in writing;
(2) submitted to the regional office or Board;
(3) clearly state that the veteran is challenging the expertise of the individual to provide evidence in the case;
and
(4) request “affirmative evidence” that establishes the individual’s competence and qualifications to provide the expert evidence submitted.
The veteran should also describe the reasons for questioning the individual’s expertise, such as, little or no experience with the veteran’s condition, an incomplete examination, errors in the examination report, specific statements made by the individual or other raising doubts about the individual’s expertise.
source: http://jimstrickland912.com/The_Veterans_Law_Review.html
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu
Netcraft rank: 15766 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment