UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label C&P. Show all posts
Showing posts with label C&P. Show all posts

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Prologue to a Veteran Affairs Claim


After nearly six years,  a VA claim was resolved to the major's satisfaction. This was after a Decision Review Officer review, a reconsideration and two remands, working on the third.

What did the major learn along the way?

In the long run, you may be better off pro se than using a service organization like the DAV or AMVETS. However,you will have to read some books first, be computer literate and also have an Internet connection. If you are not inclined to do the preceding, use one of the service organizations.

If you opt for pros se, the VARO has to give your claim an extra benefit of the doubt because you are not using a service organization.  Before you file, read these two books:

1. Veterans Administration Claims: What You Need to Know to Be Successful by Asknod.

2, Claim Denied!: How to Appeal a VA Denial of Benefits [Paperback] John D. Roche

You can purchase both books together for $32.05 from Amazon.com. Asknod also has a great blog: https://asknod.wordpress.com/

There are also numerous articles on the disability claim process in the Rightardia blog.

If you decide to go pro se, you will also need above average writing skills. You might want to test your writing skills to see where you are at: see http://www.evc-cit.info/wst/

You can use either MS Word or Libre office (Open Office) to prepare claims documentation. If you use the latter, install the Language Tool add on which provides a grammar checker that is equivalent to the one in MS Word.

When you are ready, you can file the initial claim online, using VONAPP: http://vabenefits.vba.va.gov/vonapp.

In most cases, would not recommend doing this until you have your service military records (SMR) on hand. See http://www.archives.gov/veterans/military-service-records/

Why? Because the claim will be weak and unsubstantiated without documentation from you military service  records.

If you cannot document your condition with evidence that is in your military service records, you are not likely to be successful with your claim.

Ir should be clear by now why being computer literate with an Internet connection is essential for a pro se claim.

However, you should also have Disability Benefits Questionnaires (DBQ) prepared by your doctors.The DBQ is a new innovation that should expedite he claim. A mix of doctors letters and DBQs will help make the case. See http://benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/dbq_ListByDBQFormName.asp


The VA DBQs are Acrobat pdf files which can be filled out and printed, but not saved.

The major spent about $100 on a program called PDF Nitro. It allows a user to edit, save and even compile Acrobat documents. You can also convert the documents into Word and Excel docs. If you plan to submit DBQs, you will need a program like this.

Assembling your team of physicians

Many doctors are conservative and view the VA as an unnecessary welfare program. Interview a new doctor and feel them out on their willingness to help. If they won't,  find another doctor. You will need doctors who are your advocate.  You will need a primary care doctor and one or more specialists. You want all of them to be board certified.

You also wants the physicians to indicate they have reviewed your SMRs in any letters or DBQs.

The major's team included a primary care doctor, a cardiologist, a neurologist, a psychologist and an endocrinologist. During the claim, he replaced two endocrinologists and one neurologist.

You can mail in a DBQ and the doctor's letter to the VA. Another way is to take the documents to the nearest VARO Veteran Center. The vet center will add the submission to your claim file (c-file) and put a date time stamp on it. You can also talk to a VA counselor while you are there.
Watch out for Compensation and Pension clinicians. 

Once you have submitted the claim, you may be scheduled for a compensation and pension (C&P) exams. Many of the C&P examiners are not doctors, but Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners. Rightardia suggests you insist upon a doctor if C&P calls you.

Regardless of who performs the exam, you can expect to be damned with faint praise. Unfortunately, the Ratings Veterans Services Representative (RVSR) in the VARO will consider the C&P clinician's opinion above that of your physicians

The RVSR is a primary decision maker of the outcome of your claim for VA disability compensation benefits. However, if you have provided compelling evidence in a DBQ, it may preclude a C&P exam. Try to avoid a C&P exam if at all possible. These clinicians are not your friend.

Originally, the C&P doctors we authorized to assist people who lacked medical care. Now, the VA tires to use them to see all vets with claims The DAV indicates DBQ may preclude a C&P exam. This is another reason to use a DBQ.

If you get a bad C&P exam, you have some options. You can get the C&P progress notes after the exam from the FOIA office and write a rebuttal. Errors of commission are not common, but errors of omission are very likely. Write a rebuttal and submit it to the service center.

You can also Rizzo the physician and challenge his or her credentials if the C&P exam is really substandard . You can do this years before a BVA appeal and if the VARO forgets to defend the physician's credentials, his or her physical or progress notes cannot be used in the BVA decision.

The first time the major rizzoed a C&P physician, the VARO asked him if he wanted to be serviced at another hospital. This was baloney because the C&P doctors are not part of the local VA Medical Center. In addition the local VARO supported both hospitals so it would have been pointless to change hospitals.

See http://rightardia.blogspot.com/2010/07/precendent-setting-cavc-cases-that-may.html

Although the RVSRs give primary consideration to the C&P physicians, the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA) will be far more impressed with the opinion of your board certified physicians. especially if the doctors have reviewed your SMRs, 

Although the VA is now claiming that 70 per cent of its claims are approved, most of the data the major has seen suggests that even after an appeal to the BVA, about 30 per cent of the claims are approved, 

It is likely the initial claim will not be approved by the VARO. if you have a well grounded claim, appeal to the BVA for a review by an administrative law judge.

The law judge has very different perspective than RSVRS who use a VA directive. The law judges considers the VA law in USC 38. These judges are also aware of the US Court of Veteran Appeals (USCAVC) precedent rulings that the VAROs usually ignore


The BVA may declare a condition the VARO has denied as service connected. This will result in a remand that will force the VARO to rate a condition it previously denied.

You may want to engage an attorney to represent you during the BVA hearing. Be aware the attorney will receive 20 per cent of any subsequent award.

One of the favorite ploys of a VARO is to say a claimant has not provided new evidence. The major suggests you can get new evidence whenever you visit one of you doctors. Although you may want to give the VA access to your doctor's records in the initial stages of a claim, in the long run this is a bad idea because your c-file will get huge. You also want to filter any data first that goes to the VARO.

It's better to get the progress notes after a visit, review the notes and the carry the relevant notes to the vet center. When the major finally received a Statement of Case, he had references in it to three pages of his documentation.

So document, document and document! 

Is summary, consider going pros se on the claim because you will have a better chance of your claim succeeding. You will need to be computer literate with Internet access. if you are not, use one of the service organizations like the DAV.

Assemble a strong team of physicians who are your advocates. If a doctor won't help you, find one who will.

Use DBQs, doctor's letters and progress notes to document you condition.  Make sure you board certified physicians review your SMRs and document this in your DBQs or letters, 

Expect to have the claim denied by the VARO.  If the claim is well documented, appeal to the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA). Consider hiring an attorney to represent you in the BVA hearing. The judge is attorney and the VA also has an attorney consul at the hearing.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

 Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Why the VA sucks

I posted the initial article on the FB page, "The VA is lying."

The VA approves about 15 per cent of its claims overall. If you appeal to the BVA and prevail, about 30 per cent of VA claims make the cut.

If you appeal the BVA ruling to the USCAVC, about 70 per cent of those filings are overturned.. However, only a small percentage of vets who lose a BVA appeal, go to the USCAVC.

About 15 per cent of VA are fraudulent. This means when the dust clears, about 55 per cent of vets just give up. Perhaps the claim is poorly written or lacks appropriate medical documentation. Most vets just tire of the run-around.

If the VA makes an award, the award comes out of the local VA claims office's (VARO) hide. This is really a conflict of interest and may explain why the VA is so stingy.

About 40-45 percent of claims from Iraq and Afghan vets are being approved. Not bad.

However, if you are Vietnam era vet, it's about 2-4 per cent.

Is this a dual standard for vets? You betcha!
Essentially if 100 vets were to file claims, about 20 would be approved at the the VA Regional Office (VARO) level. If you are an Iraq and Afghan vet, a Purple Heart recipient, paralyzed or paraplegic, your odds improve. 
If you appeal to the Decision Review Officer (DRO) or the Board of Veteran Appeals (BVA), another 20 per cent of those appellants get approved. 
Keep in mind the DRO is bound by it VA Manual, M21-1. It does not consider precedent rulings from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims (USCAVC) , the 38 CFR that is the VA directive or 38 USC that is public law.
The BVA will consider USCAVC precedent rulings that require a three panel judge, 38CFR and 38 USC. The BVA is legal administrative proceeding. the BVA will also consider the opinions of private practice physicians in letters and Disability Benefit Questionnaires. 
The VARO will gloss over private practice evidence if it conflicts with the Compensation and Pension (C&P) clinicians findings. Keep in mind that many of the C&P examiners are nurse practitioners and physician assistants. A board certified physician will hold more weight in front of the BVA. 
Make sure your key physicians have conducted record reviews of you military service records. This is important to the BVA.
However, the DRO or BVA base is smaller. Let's says that 50 of the 80 claimants who were rejected appeal. Only 10 would prevail at the DRO or BVA. At this point about 30 per cent of the claims have been approved. However, the BVA may only approve one of your 4 claims and remand the other three back to the VARO for development.
You are now playing remand ping pong with the your other three claims. 
We now have 40 claimants left who didn't make the cut at the DRO or BVA. These appellants can apeal to the USCAVC. If 10 appeal, about seven will prevail. 
These examples are hypothetical and based on limited data the VA has provided on claims. Much of this information was harvested from congressional testimony.
Of the 33 remaining claimants. about half (15) are fraudulent. If you file a fraudulent claim, you will most likely receive a quick reject. You can also be prosecuted.
It behooves the vet to appeal if he/she have a well grounded claim. The writer recently discovered he was very fortunate to prevail in front of the BVA without an attorney. Generally, once you get into appeals, you should probably hire an attorney. 
Refine your claim based on the attorney's advice and bring in new substantial evidence at the DRO and BVA levels, 
Once you appeal to the USCAVC, the claim is locked. You cannot introduce new evidence.
What do these statistics suggest. Appeal, young person, appeal!
Your odds of winning are highest at the USCAVC level, but you better have a solid claim. You cannot introduce new evidence once the BVA hearing is over. 
graphics: courtesy of AskNod blog.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 
 Creative Commons License

Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.