UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label aclu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aclu. Show all posts

Sunday, April 8, 2012

ACLU: Let Ruthelle vote



Uploaded by  on Apr 1, 2012


MEET RUTHELLE.


Watch a video with Ruthelle, the 84 year-old client in our challenge to Wisconsin's voter ID law.


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Corrections Corporation of America has a deal you can't refuse


The ACLU noticed that the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the largest private prison company in the country, sent a letter to 48 state governors offering to buy up their state-owned and operated prisons.

It offering cash-strapped states a quick infusion of money by taking control state-owned prisons.

Does this sound too good to be true?

It is.  The state would have to sign a 20-year contract and promise a 90 percent occupancy rate over that period.

In other words, CCA is asking states to commit to maintaining prisons filled to capacity. This makes sense, since CCA is a for-profit business whose success depends on keeping prisons full.

In fact, in a 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, CCA stated: “The demand for our facilities and services could be adversely affected by

…leniency in conviction or parole standards and sentencing practices.

In other words, CCA has much to gain from policies that lock up people. 

Rightardia has pointed out that privatization may look good in the short term, but in the long term it is more expensive. This is why CCA wants a 20-year contract. 

The state will have to appoint a public services commission to oversee the private prisons and provide and operations and maintenance subsidy to operate the prisons. 

Almost all of the studies that have compared operation of private to public prisons have been inconclusive, although CCA will suggest otherwise. 

Who would be the big losers in prison privatization. 
  1. the taxpayer will end up paying more to operate these prisons because of higher overhead costs. 
  2. the prison staff and guards will see big losses in pay and lose their pensions. 
Who will be he big winners? 
  1. CEOS and top executives will get big salaries and bonuses at the expense of the workers.
  2. shareholders will also benefit. 
Rightardia views the prison privatization scheme as more crony capitalism. 


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

WIN: Senate Appears Ready To Pass A Bill Allowing The U.S. Military To Act Against U.S. Citizens Inside The U.S.- 12/15/11


12/14/2011

By Doug Cunningham
Wednesday was a national day of action protesting a new law that would allow the use of the U.S. military inside the U.S. against U.S. citizens. Occupy Washington D.C. sat in at U.S. Senator Carl Levin’s office to protest the proposed law. Occupy’s Kevin Zeese says this radical change in law will allow the use of the U.S. military against protesters and would allow the military to grab citizens off the streets and hold them indefinitely based on mere suspicion of being engaged in hostilities against the U.S. It’s a major shift since the U.S. has largely banned the use of the military inside the country under the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.
By Doug Cunningham
Wednesday was a national day of action protesting a new law that would allow the use of the U.S. military inside the U.S. against U.S. citizens.

Occupy Washington D.C. sat in at U.S. Senator Carl Levin’s office to protest the proposed law.

Occupy’s Kevin Zeese says this radical change in law will allow the use of the U.S. military against protesters and would allow the military to grab citizens off the streets and hold them indefinitely based on mere suspicion of being engaged in hostilities against the U.S.

It’s a major shift since the U.S. has largely banned the use of the military inside the country under the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the that the bill will say that the homeland will be part of the battlefield   "and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial “American citizen or not."

The U.S. Constitution specifically includes the habeas procedure in the Suspension Clause, located in Article One, Section 9. This states that "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it."

Many civill bertairans say this law will abrogate the 6th Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

The ACLU said:

The Senate voted last Thursday to pass S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which would authorize the president to send the military literally anywhere in the world to imprison civilians without charge or trial. Prison based on suspicion alone.

The power is so sweeping that the president would be able to direct the military to use its powers within the United States itself, and even lock up American citizens without charge or trial.

No corner of the world, not even your own home, would be off-limits to the military.

The Patriot Act is quite draconinaian and needs to be repealed. Why is President Obama, who is a constitional attorney, allowing this act to go into law? He has already indicated a willingness to sign the act into law..

See http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/behind-closed-doors-congress-trying-force-indefinite-detention-bill-americans

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA  

Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.