Published: 23 December, 2010, 19:26 Edited: 23 December, 2010, 23:30
With the US approval process completed it is Russia’s turn to ratify the New START treaty. On Thursday, Moscow received Washington's documents and Russian parliamentarians say the pact could be signed by the end of this week.
Earlier on Thursday, Dmitry Medvedev’s spokeswoman Natalya Timakova said the Russian president welcomed the ratification "with satisfaction" and "expressed hope that the State Duma and the Federation Council are ready to examine this question and ratify the document."
Even though there is some opposition to the agreement in Russia’s State Duma representatives of the United Russia party, they are ready to approve this most significant arms control agreement.
The ratification procedure in Russia involves three steps: approvals from the lower and the upper houses of parliament and then the signing of the ratification document by the president.
The New START Treaty was approved by the US Senate on Wednesday after long and hard partisan discussions.
Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev signed the agreement in April in Prague, but it has since been bogged down by delays across the Atlantic.
Speaking about the role New START plays for both allies, Yury Rogulov from the political history department at Moscow State University said that the treaty is crucial for improving relations between Russia and the US.
“Without ratification of this treaty we could not hope for the improvement, serious improvement of relations between the two countries. And right now the situation is quite favorable for cooperation between the two countries on many international issues – from the anti-missile system in Europe to Afghanistan and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It makes us hopeful speaking about the nearest future for our countries.”
Tom Collina, research director at the Arms Control Association, said the ratification could usher in further cooperation in reducing nuclear stockpiles.
“It is a great boon for Russia-US relations and hopefully will lead to further negotiations on deeper cuts in nuclear arsenals, addressing tactical short-range nuclear weapons as well,” Collina said. “I think this is just the beginning of a much more fruitful relationship between both sides.”
By showing that the US and Russia are taking another step toward significant arms reduction, the treaty may affect the nuclear policy of other countries, suggested Greg Thielmann, a senior fellow at the Arms Control Association.
“It does put pressure on the others to become transparent, and to be more willing to engage in what they can do to move toward nuclear disarmament,” he said.
Anti-nuclear campaigner and British Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn says that the new treaty should spur on other countries to move toward what he calls “global zero”, when all nations can get rid of nuclear weapons together.
“It is such a huge step and it was predicted to end in failure. So the fact that president Obama and President Medvedev have come to the agreement is a huge step forward and it’s got to be a spur,” Corbyn says.
Surely the next thing is for all nations to agree not to renew their nuclear systems because most of them are preparing some kind of upgrade or some kind of renewal. And then move on to a new nuclear weapons convention that can include all nations in the world, including those that are not signatories to the non-proliferation treaty, particularly Israel, India, Pakistan, both Koreas.
However, democratic strategist Robert Weiner says the thought that a pact would offer a cue to other nuclear states to join the process of cutting the nuclear arms is quite controversial.
Well, this is a very strong argument because how can we ask Iran to have zero if the United States and Russia have 20,000 nuclear weapons?”, he said. “So the fact that we are willing to cut is a moral statement that the world will pay attention to and it gives credence to a dream from Reagan to Obama and all the secretaries of state in between from both parties that perhaps someday we can have a nuclear-free world. That really is the objective that we all want and everybody makes fun of a dream, but I think none of us wants to die.
A former Republican senator, Chuck Hagel, says that those who opposed the treaty for months changed their mind because the new START is clearly in the interest of America.
There was a realization that an immense knowledge base was all in favor of ratification,” Hagel said. “Those who over the years for the United States government had responsibility for nuclear weapons and for strategies and for foreign policy all were overwhelmingly in support of this… it was clearly in the interest of the United States as well as Russia. So I think that in the end… knowledge and information won out over politics.
The public in the US has been supportive of ratification of this treaty mainly because of the “understanding that the word without nuclear weapons is a better world.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Netcraft rank: 6706 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
Rightardia.blogspot.com
With the US approval process completed it is Russia’s turn to ratify the New START treaty. On Thursday, Moscow received Washington's documents and Russian parliamentarians say the pact could be signed by the end of this week.
Earlier on Thursday, Dmitry Medvedev’s spokeswoman Natalya Timakova said the Russian president welcomed the ratification "with satisfaction" and "expressed hope that the State Duma and the Federation Council are ready to examine this question and ratify the document."
Even though there is some opposition to the agreement in Russia’s State Duma representatives of the United Russia party, they are ready to approve this most significant arms control agreement.
The ratification procedure in Russia involves three steps: approvals from the lower and the upper houses of parliament and then the signing of the ratification document by the president.
The New START Treaty was approved by the US Senate on Wednesday after long and hard partisan discussions.
Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev signed the agreement in April in Prague, but it has since been bogged down by delays across the Atlantic.
Speaking about the role New START plays for both allies, Yury Rogulov from the political history department at Moscow State University said that the treaty is crucial for improving relations between Russia and the US.
“Without ratification of this treaty we could not hope for the improvement, serious improvement of relations between the two countries. And right now the situation is quite favorable for cooperation between the two countries on many international issues – from the anti-missile system in Europe to Afghanistan and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It makes us hopeful speaking about the nearest future for our countries.”
Tom Collina, research director at the Arms Control Association, said the ratification could usher in further cooperation in reducing nuclear stockpiles.
“It is a great boon for Russia-US relations and hopefully will lead to further negotiations on deeper cuts in nuclear arsenals, addressing tactical short-range nuclear weapons as well,” Collina said. “I think this is just the beginning of a much more fruitful relationship between both sides.”
By showing that the US and Russia are taking another step toward significant arms reduction, the treaty may affect the nuclear policy of other countries, suggested Greg Thielmann, a senior fellow at the Arms Control Association.
“It does put pressure on the others to become transparent, and to be more willing to engage in what they can do to move toward nuclear disarmament,” he said.
Anti-nuclear campaigner and British Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn says that the new treaty should spur on other countries to move toward what he calls “global zero”, when all nations can get rid of nuclear weapons together.
“It is such a huge step and it was predicted to end in failure. So the fact that president Obama and President Medvedev have come to the agreement is a huge step forward and it’s got to be a spur,” Corbyn says.
Surely the next thing is for all nations to agree not to renew their nuclear systems because most of them are preparing some kind of upgrade or some kind of renewal. And then move on to a new nuclear weapons convention that can include all nations in the world, including those that are not signatories to the non-proliferation treaty, particularly Israel, India, Pakistan, both Koreas.
However, democratic strategist Robert Weiner says the thought that a pact would offer a cue to other nuclear states to join the process of cutting the nuclear arms is quite controversial.
Well, this is a very strong argument because how can we ask Iran to have zero if the United States and Russia have 20,000 nuclear weapons?”, he said. “So the fact that we are willing to cut is a moral statement that the world will pay attention to and it gives credence to a dream from Reagan to Obama and all the secretaries of state in between from both parties that perhaps someday we can have a nuclear-free world. That really is the objective that we all want and everybody makes fun of a dream, but I think none of us wants to die.
A former Republican senator, Chuck Hagel, says that those who opposed the treaty for months changed their mind because the new START is clearly in the interest of America.
There was a realization that an immense knowledge base was all in favor of ratification,” Hagel said. “Those who over the years for the United States government had responsibility for nuclear weapons and for strategies and for foreign policy all were overwhelmingly in support of this… it was clearly in the interest of the United States as well as Russia. So I think that in the end… knowledge and information won out over politics.
The public in the US has been supportive of ratification of this treaty mainly because of the “understanding that the word without nuclear weapons is a better world.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Netcraft rank: 6706 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
Rightardia.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment