By CARRIE BUDOFF BROWN | 2/23/10 8:29 PM EST
An idea that seemed toxic only weeks ago — using a parliamentary tactic to ram health reform through the Senate — is gaining acceptance among moderate Democrats who have resisted the strategy.
The subtle shift among this small group of centrist senators could mean the difference between success and failure for health care reform — giving Democrats a potential road map for passing a bill that had been left for dead after the Massachusetts Senate defeat.
That mood in the Senate was matched Tuesday by a growing momentum for President Barack Obama’s health care proposal in the House, where Democrats were beginning to coalesce around the view that getting something for health care is better than nothing at all.
These shifts couldn’t come at a better time for Obama ahead of Thursday’s health care summit. The White House has signaled he’s prepared to use reconciliation, which would require just 51 votes to pass health reform.
The Democratic strategy for selling the public on the tactic, especially if no Republicans sign on to Obama’s plan is simple: The GOP made us do it.
“Obviously, if the minority is just frustrating the process, that argues for taking steps to get the public’s business done,” said Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.). Bayh was one of the leading voices against the procedure after the Massachusetts election, calling it “very ill-advised.”
“At the same time ... Republicans would probably shut the place down, but you could argue they are doing that anyway,” Bayh said.
Bayh’s remarks Tuesday came a day after Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) cited Republican obstructionism as a reason why she could embrace the parliamentary maneuver to pass health care reform. Last month, she said she was leaning against reconciliation.
“I’m staying open to see how these negotiations go forward,” Landrieu said. “I’ve not generally been a big supporter, but the Republican Party, the leadership, has really been very, very, very disingenuous in this process.”
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said he doesn’t prefer reconciliation, but it may be the only way.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu
source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33398.html
Netcraft rank: 5948 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
An idea that seemed toxic only weeks ago — using a parliamentary tactic to ram health reform through the Senate — is gaining acceptance among moderate Democrats who have resisted the strategy.
The subtle shift among this small group of centrist senators could mean the difference between success and failure for health care reform — giving Democrats a potential road map for passing a bill that had been left for dead after the Massachusetts Senate defeat.
That mood in the Senate was matched Tuesday by a growing momentum for President Barack Obama’s health care proposal in the House, where Democrats were beginning to coalesce around the view that getting something for health care is better than nothing at all.
These shifts couldn’t come at a better time for Obama ahead of Thursday’s health care summit. The White House has signaled he’s prepared to use reconciliation, which would require just 51 votes to pass health reform.
The Democratic strategy for selling the public on the tactic, especially if no Republicans sign on to Obama’s plan is simple: The GOP made us do it.
“Obviously, if the minority is just frustrating the process, that argues for taking steps to get the public’s business done,” said Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.). Bayh was one of the leading voices against the procedure after the Massachusetts election, calling it “very ill-advised.”
“At the same time ... Republicans would probably shut the place down, but you could argue they are doing that anyway,” Bayh said.
Bayh’s remarks Tuesday came a day after Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) cited Republican obstructionism as a reason why she could embrace the parliamentary maneuver to pass health care reform. Last month, she said she was leaning against reconciliation.
“I’m staying open to see how these negotiations go forward,” Landrieu said. “I’ve not generally been a big supporter, but the Republican Party, the leadership, has really been very, very, very disingenuous in this process.”
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said he doesn’t prefer reconciliation, but it may be the only way.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu
source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33398.html
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment