UA-9726592-1

Monday, September 14, 2009

Tea Bagger event used old 2004 photos to create false impression of crowd size

PM   |   Updated: 09-14-09 06:28 PM


Tea Party protesters trying to tout the size of their march on Washington last weekend have been passing around a photo of a packed National Mall. But the picture is years old.

Politifact asked Pete Piringer, public affairs officer for the D.C. Fire and Emergency Department, if the rally was big enough to fill that space. Piringer said no -- and moreover, the picture can't be from 2009.

"It was an impressive crowd," he said. But after marching down Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol the crowd "only filled the Capitol grounds, maybe up to Third Street," he said.
Yet the photo showed the crowd sprawling far beyond that to the Washington Monument, which is bordered by 15th and and 17th Streets.
There's another big problem with the photograph: it doesn't include the National Museum of the American Indian, a building located at the corner of Fourth St. and Independence Ave. that opened on Sept. 14, 2004. (Looking at the photograph, the building should be in the upper right hand corner of the National Mall, next to the Air and Space Museum.)
That means the picture was taken before the museum opened exactly five years ago. So clearly the photo doesn't show the "tea party" crowd from the Sept. 12 protest.
Rightardia comment: The Major used to be a photo officer and noticed the first photos of the event were  tightly cropped and shot from odd angles. Rightardia published an article suggesting the crowd did not appear to have much depth. See http://rightardia.blogspot.com/2009/09/tea-party-march-on-washington-looks.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/14/912-tea-party-photo-false_n_286082.html

Washington Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 10118 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

No comments: