Published on Jul 14, 2012 by AdamsStProject

Charter Schools have advantages but their performance has been circumspect. The last Florida report  suggested charter schools are outperforming public schools, but this is the first year that there has been such evidence.

A 15 state study suggested otherwise: charter school performance is little different form public school.

See http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/10/2741430/florida-releases-report-on-charter.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/29/study-charter-school-students-performance-average/
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Republicans wants to revive Bibical stoning

As Vice President of the Chalcedon Institute Martin Selbrede stated in the Institute's March/April 2010 issue of Faith For All Of Life, the only reason Bill Gothard didn't agree to use Chalcedon founder R.J. Rushdoony's monumental Institutes of Biblical Law tome in Gothard's sprawling evangelical empire is that the two couldn't agree on divorce.

Rushdoony's Institutes has provided a template for instituting Biblical law in government  . . .

As Selbrede wrote,

[T]he divide between Gothard and Rushdoony on divorce was a deep and abiding one. Gothard proposed using Rushdoony's Institutes of Biblical Law as a resource for his massive ministry; the sheer volume of the resulting sales would have made Rushdoony both rich and famous. Gothard's condition for moving forward on this was letter-simple: Rushdoony merely needed to remove the section on divorce from his book, and the highly profitable deal would be sealed.

Rushdoony refused the offer."

So, while Gothard was categorically opposed to divorce, Rushdoony, a virulently racist Holocaust denier who espoused Geocentrism, was a little more liberal on divorce. In other words, the two men were otherwise in substantial agreement - except for the sticking point of divorce, they both agreed that Rushdoony's vision for Biblical law should be imposed upon America.

That vision included instituting stoning as a form of capital punishment for rape, kidnapping, murder, heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, extreme juvenile delinquency, and "unchastity before marriage.

Daniel Webster's association with Bill Gothard's Institute For Basic Life Training has continued into the present, and a speech Webster made at a Nashville IBLP conference in 2009 has now become a source of controversy due to a new Alan Grayson campaign ad. Grayson is currently taking a media drubbing because of an ad campaign ad that calls Grayson's political opponent, Republican Daniel Webster, "Taliban Dan."

An assessment from Factcheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, has charged that a new Grayson campaign ad attacking Grayson's political opponent, Republican Daniel Webster, takes out of context statements Webster made in a speech at a 2009 conference of a religious organization called the "Institute of Basic Life Principles."

But die-hard religious right researchers at ReligionDispatches.org are raising questions about Factcheck.org's charge, and Religion Dispatches editor Sarah Posner calls out Factcheck.org in turn for its benign depiction of Bill Gothard's IBLP, noting that "Factcheck.org fails. to describe what the IBLP is really about, describing it as a "non-denominational Christia organization that runs programs and training sessions."

Politifact rated Grayson's comments half true but did not provide much of a rationale for their determination.

Many across the political spectrum appear appalled by the Grayson campaign's "Taliban" label but Daniel Webster's nearly three-decade long, intimate involvement with the Bill Gothard and the Institute For Basic Life Principles suggests that the label may be less than hyperbolic.

Wesbter's association with Bill Gothard and the IBLP is noteworthy for other
reasons :

As described in a February 18, 1999 story in the Broward/Palm Beach New Times, by Bob Norman, Bill Gothard's Character First! curriculum, now being
taught in public school systems across the United States, teaches an extreme form of submission to authority. As Norman's story begins,

One of the lessons for today is obedience, and the first graders at the school inside the First Christian Church building in Fort Lauderdale sing about it quite obediently.

While the students at the Charter School of Excellence are divided fairly evenly between blacks and whites, they dress alike, with the boys in dark blue pants and green buttoned-up golf shirts and the girls wearing white blouses under plaid jumpers. All eyes are focused on their young and attractive teacher, Mrs. Blocker, who leads them in song:

Obedience is listening attentively,
Obedience will take instructions joyfully,
Obedience heeds wishes of authorities,
Obedience will follow orders instantly.
For when I am busy at my work or play,
And someone calls my name, I'll answer right away!
I'll be ready with a smile to go the extra mile
As soon as I can say "Yes, sir!" "Yes ma'am!"
Hup, two, three!

Is anyone surprise that the GOP would prefer to provide vouchers so parents can send there kids to private schools dominated by right wing churches? I guess they prefer to save money indoctrinating kids in private schools rather than 'fixing public education.'

Rightardia consider this sort of obedience to be reminiscent of German fascism in World War 2.

source: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/29/alan-graysons-fl-republican-opponent-tied-to-biblical-stoning-movement-aka-christian-reconstructionism/

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 8363
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Are you tired of the 'party of stupid's' attack on public education?

The right has been described as anti-intellectual. This anti-intellectualism is personified by Rush Limbaugh who uses emotional rants with few facts in his diatribes. Limbaugh was enrolled in college for two term but failed every course including ballroom dancing according to his mother.

This is a party that seems to embrace ignorance for ignorance's sake, as if "facts and figures" are inconvenient annoyances better left to eggheads who read books. Stephen Colbert's parody of modern Republican leaders rings true for good reasons.

Nicholas Kristof noted that Obama's election, among other things, may mark the end of "the anti-intellectualism that has long been a strain in American life."

In August, Paul Krugman had a fairly devastating piece identifying the GOP as "the party of stupid." As the Nobel Laureate explained, "What I mean ... is that know-nothingism -- the insistence that there are simple, brute-force, instant-gratification answers to every problem, and that there's something effeminate and weak about anyone who suggests otherwise -- has become the core of Republican policy and political strategy. The party's de facto slogan has become: 'Real men don't think things through.'"

According to Steve Benen f the party is sincerely looking for a way out of its self-dug ditch, taking facts, reason, and evidence seriously again would be a good start.

GOP ideology

To make matters worse, the party that is the least equipped to deal with Americans educational problems has been tinkering with it. Because of the GOP ideology about privatization and deregulation, the GOP has experimented with corporate Edison Schools which are private schools funded by the state. It has also tried magnet schools which have a specialized curricula like art, music or accelerated classes.

Charter schools are similar to Edison Schools but they are locally organized and not affiliated with a corporation like Edison schools. Charter schools receive startup funds but after the initial year, they are funded identically like public schools by the state.

Funding is the key issue. Whether the school is public, Edison or a charter school, the funding is the same and the educational outcome is very similar for all of these schools.

The Florida Example

Because many Republicans leaders have spent their careers in corporations, they believed that schools could be more effective if they were evaluated. In Florida Governor Jeb Bush got funding for a new test called with The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test® (FCAT). There are many educational assessment tests that could have been taken off the shelf. Undoubtedly some happy conservative institution got the contract to reinvent the wheel with the FCAT.

The FCAT was too long and too hard for Florida students. After a couple of years the test was shortened and 'dumbed down.' Even worse teachers started to teach the test, particularly English and math teachers, because they were being evaluated based on their classes performance on the FCAT.

The governor also decided that the 'good teachers' needed to be paid more than the average teachers. Unfortunately when Florida tax revenues crashed after the real estate meltdown, many of the 'good teachers' lost their jobs because they were making too much money. This was the supreme irony in the grand GOP experiment with education in Florida.

To make matters worse, young people are moving from Florida to states with better pay and better schools. As a result of the declining school enrollment, Florida is closing public schools as well.

State senators had approved a $428 million four-year corporate income tax break after it had given out more than $1.5 billion in tax breaks since Jeb Bush's election in 1998 .

Charlie Crist, the current Florida governor, hasn't done much better. He fiddled with real estate taxes which produced an even worse deficit once the sub prime mortgage crises hit Florida. At one time Florida was advocating removing the school system from funding by local real estate taxes. Fortunately Florida voters defeated this bad idea.

Florida was ranked 29^th in the nation in 2006-2007 school year. It is likely its ratings will fall in the next Morgan Quinto rankings because of teacher lay offs and school closures. The real problem with Florida schools is funding. In the 2003-2004 school year Florida spent $8,084 and was ranked 36^th in the nation. The latest per pupil statistic indicated funding is now $6,056 and Florida's rank has dropped to 44^th in the nation.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that the there is a crises in Florida schools and that cannot be resolved with corporate style management or standardized tests. More spending is needed to fix the state school system. It is unlikely that the 'party of stupid' will fix the problem. This is why Florida needs to start electing progressive leadership that will fix the state's school system. Spending more on students is essential in Florida. 

resources:

http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_11/015591.php

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs