UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label Republican Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican Party. Show all posts

Friday, June 1, 2012

When the GOP says we're here to help

This is what Republicans really mean.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

FOD: Women's Health Experts Speak Out


Women's Health Experts Speak Out from Judd Nelson



100% of male experts agree: nobody knows more about women's issues like birth control than late-middle-aged men and the Republican party is well aware of this fact. 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Monday, February 20, 2012

A Special American Women's Message To Republican Party




Uploaded by  on Apr 10, 2011
American Women's Message To Republican Party is simple, We want choice. Leave our birth control and Planned Parenthood alone! 

Take your religious family values and political correctness somewhere else. 

License:

Standard YouTube License

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Sarah Palin and the Half-Baked Republicans (Rated PG due to recklessness)


25 July, 2009, 14:30

As Palin exits from Alaskan politics, are the Neocons dressing up their agenda in high-heels and lipstick, hoping the soft sell will give them the White House in 2012, or is the reason much simpler?

Considering Sarah Palin’s bizarre resignation speech, complete with quirky quotes lifted from her mother’s refrigerator magnets, peppered with allusions to her outstanding bills, and served against a backdrop of wild ducks and geese, it seems Alaska’s most popular lady has lost her political bearings in a snowstorm. Yes, the Republicans should just exile this hockey mom to some offbeat speaking circuit where she can’t do anymore harm than she’s already done.

But perhaps we underestimate the statecraft of this gritty, down-to-earth woman. Political pundits are almost unanimous in the belief that Palin’s decision to quit the governorship of Alaska is the equivalent of political hari kari. But they seem to forget what has been the essence of Palin’s mysterious attraction from the very beginning: an ability to shine through her cutesy klutziness, and crack a smile and a wink through her stammering, ala Ronald Reagan, and to a lesser degree, George W. Bush.

After all, as the Republican Party knows all too well, voters don’t usually throw their weight behind annoying intellectuals, bespectacled and bald know-it-alls who only make everyone feel inferior. So now plain Palin, betting the house on the victim card, is slowly turning the tables on her doubting detractors.

“Indeed, if political figures stand for ideas, victimization is what Ms. Palin is all about,” wrote Thomas Frank, in The Wall Street Journal. “It is her brand, her myth. Ronald Reagan stood tall. John McCain was about service. Barack Obama has hope. Sarah Palin is a collector of grievances. She runs for office by griping.”

In many ways, Sarah Palin is a byproduct of the Age of Whine, a cultural movement largely underwritten by the likes of Oprah Winfrey, and enhanced by an increasingly ubiquitous media, where “victims” of every stripe line up for their 15 minutes of dubious fame.

In the past, personal problems were concealed from public view out of simple self-respect and decency; today, our deficiencies are sported like colorful tattoos for all to marvel at. And heaven help the person who fails to genuflect on bloody bended knee to a victim.

Sarah Palin’s handlers “find offense in the most harmless remarks and diabolical calculation in the inflections of the anchorman’s voice,” Frank continues. “They take insults out of context to make them seem even more insulting. They pay close attention to voices that are ordinarily ignored, relishing every blogger’s sneer, every celebrity’s slight, and every crazy Internet rumor.”

According to members of the Liberal camp, Palin exaggerating the comments of her critics constitutes the sole attraction of her traveling circus. But many in the Republican Party, of course, do not see it that way. Indeed, US conservatives view the attacks against Palin as symptomatic of a sick and godless society that cannot bear to see a moral and honorable woman supporting every respectable lifestyle that the Liberals have soundly rejected.

“The reaction to Palin’s nomination was as visceral as it was unhinged…” wrote Matthew Continetti, associate editor of The Weekly Standard. “Comedians lampooned her accent, her looks, her religion, her education and her family.”

A good example of Palin’s alleged hypersensitivity was when she jumped at the opportunity of upbraiding “Late Night” talk show host David Letterman for poking fun at her 18-year-old daughter Bristol.

Letterman, who makes a very good living ridiculing the ridiculous, opened his nightly monologue with the news that the Alaska governor was in New York City for a Yankees baseball game.

After describing Palin as having the fashion taste of a “slutty flight attendant,” the popular talk-show host crossed the line of respectability, Republicans say, when he made a cheap joke at Palin’s daughter's expense.

“One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,” Letterman quipped, “during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rogriguez.”

The punch line of this tasteless joke was based on Palin’s daughter Bristol, 18, who delivered a baby out-of-wedlock. But the joke was on Letterman, who (probably) was unaware that it was not Bristol who was in attendance at the Yankees game, but rather Palin’s other daughter, Willow, who is only 14.

This naturally set off a chain reaction of blistering volleys across America’s political tennis court, with Republicans accusing Letterman of endorsing sex with minors, and Democrats snapping back that the Republicans lost their sense of humor. It may have also been lost on Letterman that a whopping 40% of newborns in the United States are delivered out of wedlock.

Dragging innocent children into the political crossfire is never a good idea. So Palin was a bit hypocritical when she dedicated a disproportionate slab of her resignation speech to her own son, Trig, who was born last year with Down Syndrome.

Palin expressed pity for Trig’s siblings who saw “their baby brother… mocked and ridiculed by some pretty mean-spirited adults recently. And by the way, I sure wish folks could understand (garbled) all that we can learn, all of us, from somebody like Trig. I know he needs me, but I know that I need him even more. The world needs more Trigs, not fewer.”

Is there really a place in a governor’s resignation speech to gush about the children? If Trig was the sole reason that Palin was calling it quits, then perhaps it would be understandable. But that is certainly not the case. If anything, Palin will probably hit the speaking trail in the very near future, and it is highly unlikely that Trig will be tagging along. The strangest thing is that nobody is even talking about Trig besides Sarah Palin.

Although Palin may have been honestly trying to win sympathy for her special-needs child, to do so during one of her most critical speeches risked looking like a cheap way of garnering political points.

“Stop bringing your kids into this,” commented Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks political show. “It’s such a weak defense shield she puts up. Anytime you criticize how painfully stupid she is, she says, ‘are you talking about my kids?!’”

Cosmetic surgery for the Republicans?

Palin’s resignation may suggest deeper thinking on the part of the GOP than most pundits are willing to admit: the Republicans understand that their embattled party desperately needs a fresh new face to bring home the political bacon, and Palin, despite all of her many flaws, may just be that person.

After 8 years of unadulterated arrogance under the reign of George Bush II, the Republican fraternity of stupid white men, now practically indistinguishable from the equally challenged Neoconservatives, has become a genetically modified beast of burden.

Their message does not flush with the slowly evolving perceptions of average Americans, who are finally coming around to the realization that there are more pressing matters in life (like national healthcare, for example, and allies who are more fond of us than our enemies) than waging an endless battle against evil shadows.

Dubya’s administration was top heavy with some of the most loathsome individuals to serve in government since at least the days of Genghis Khan. And I can only speculate what future historians will have to say about “we the people” who allowed such endearing fellows, like Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, John Bolton, Richard Perle, Robert Zoellick and Paul Wolfowitz, for example, anywhere near the halls of power.

The least offensive thing that can be said for the Bush administration is that the deep scars from those two terrible terms will show on the face of Lady Liberty for a long time.

But it didn’t have to be this bad for the Republicans, of course. After all, the majority of Americans still proclaim a strong attachment to the conservative movement (briefly, core conservative principles include a devotion to God, small government, entrepreneurialism and limited involvement in global affairs). This only proves that the Republicans shot themselves very accurately in both feet when it is considered how the Democrats manhandled them in the 2006 and 2008 elections.

Today, the Republicans have no choice but to boot into the bright lights a new and improved representative of their extremely unpopular policies, which probably won’t change too much in the years to come. But it can’t be just another sweet-talking, used-car salesman type of guy. And the “maverick” trick has already been tried by John McCain in his failed run at the presidency.

No, the next big Rove stunt (with all fairness to the Republican mastermind, he was reportedly baffled by Palin’s retirement as much as anybody) must embrace somebody who does not immediately draw associations with the foaming-at-the-mouth Neocons. In other words, a person who walks, talks and smells like a Republican, but doesn’t really look like a Republican. Although to admit as much bodes very badly for the overall condition of the Republican Party, the GOP desperately need this woman.

Perhaps Palin’s clumsy announcement was designed to look like the absentminded meanderings of an overworked hockey mom (The announcement, incidentally, was made just before the Fourth of July holiday weekend, which suggests that Palin wanted to make the announcement when it would receive the greatest attention; those who make the opposite argument, that announcing her resignation over the holidays would have reduced the fanfare, forget how many people today spend the holidays glued to their televisions and computers).

If so, the ploy certainly worked. Palin’s surprise resignation produced exactly the effect the Republican strategists were hoping for: thousands of sound-bite moments beamed into living rooms and laptops across the 50 states.

Wham-bam, thank you, ma'am! Just like that, almost-forgotten Sarah Palin, the victimized vice-presidential candidate of a losing Republican ticket, is right back at the top of the steaming political pile, and on the tongue of every political pundit. And most importantly, all free of charge.

Had Palin decided to remain the fair governor of faraway Alaska, a state that most Americans only associate with uselessly large animals and bad weather, her political career would have stalled like a snowmobile in the middle of the tundra.

Yet Palin has already caught a whiff of the White House, the poisonous elixir of ultimate power, more alluring than Chanel No. 5, and now nothing can stop this lady’s ambitions.

Now Sarah Palin, freed from the burden of governing America’s largest state, will be spending the next four years crisscrossing the United States, shaking hands, kissing babies, collecting money and testing the political waters.

By the next presidential election season, if things are not going smoothly for Barack Obama, this tenacious lady will be more than ready to bring the Republican Party back from the political graveyard. After all, stranger things have happened. Just ask George W. Bush.

Robert Bridge, RT

http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-07-25/sarah-palin-and-the-half-baked-republicans--rated-pg-due-to-recklessness-.html?fullstory


Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 24118 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=842818698226B7BA4A1D0E313F8F#24118

Monday, July 27, 2009

MoveOn.org attacks Palin on Clean Energy

MoveOn.org has a new ad that attacks former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and Republican Party's opposition to green jobs. The 30-second spot, entitled "New Face," comes not long after Palin attacked Obama's energy bill in the Washington Post.



source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/moveonorg-releases-ad-abo_n_245784.html

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 30670

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

The Latino Hertiage Wall video

This is a very funny video about the GOP. You will have to use the link to see it since the Huffington Post did not provide any way to embed the video.


Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 44637

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Did Cities, Republicans Lose on Stimulus?

Editor's Note:  Elections do have consequences. For years the South has been the recipients of the largesse of the donor states in the North East and the West. Most of the military bases exist in the South and also benefit from billions of dollars of federal dollars that are injected into the local economies. 

Most of the states have between 30 to 40 per cent of the taxpayers who don't pay federal income tax are in the South. Yet these people who have gained so much from the federal government are conservative. Talk about biting the hand that feeds them!

The Daily Beast - The Morning Scoop - July 9, 2009


As the first rounds of stimulus-spending projects are approved, new reports are shedding light on some surprising trends. According to USA Today, counties that supported President Obama in the 2008 election have received more than twice as much per person, an average of $69, as those that supported John McCain, which received $34 per person. 
 
While on the surface the disparity raises red flags, investigators and watchdog groups consulted by USA Today said that the process by which funds are distributed likely would make it impossible for the Obama administration to direct money to their supporters even if they wanted to. 
 
Another report on stimulus spending, by The New York Times, finds that cities are getting less than half of the first round of transportation funds despite housing two-thirds of the country's population. The disparity is being blamed on state legislatures, whom urban advocates say are directing funds to more-remote areas in order to spread them out among state lawmakers' districts.

Read it at USA Today:
http://e.thedailybeast.com/a/tBKVeB$B7SwhTB7uYZZ-chc-qkY/dail5

 Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs

Netcraft rank: 66069

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Narcissism and authoritarianism in the Republican Party


In Todd Purdum's Vanity Fair article about Sarah Palin, Purdum noted that several Alaskans told him "they had consulted the definition of `narcissistic personality disorder' in trying to understand their governor. This disorder, Purdum points out, is marked by "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy."

Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance and a deep need for admiration. They believe that they're superior to others and have little regard for other people's feelings. But behind this mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-esteem, vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

Megalomania is similar term. It is a historical term for behavior characterized by an obsession or preoccupation with wealth, power, genius, or omnipotence—often generally termed as delusions of grandeur or grandiose delusions. Megalomania denotes an obsession with having and/or obtaining, grandiosity and extravagance.

One common feature with NPD and megalomania is that the individual with this condition is 'always right. ' Where have we heard that before?

Announcer: Now from Midtown Manhattan, New York City's most listened to host...Rush Limbaugh.
Rush: "Hi Ya folks. Ah, welcome back. Rush Limbaugh here, highly trained broadcast specialist executing assigned host duties flawlessly. Zero mistakes, now documented to be almost always right 98.8 percent of the time. It's an amazing feat. Never the less, ah, take it for what it is. We're very proud of it.

Is Rush Limbaugh a narcissist? He certainly exhibits the features of one and his three failed marriages suggests he is hard to live with. Narcissists are authoritarian and authoritarianism is a hallmark of the right wing. James Dean if Watergate infame recently wrote an op-ed piece in which he stated that the Goldwater conservatism of the past has morphed into simple authoritarianism. This started when Newt Gingrich became Speaker of the House. Newt was one of the most authoritarian personalties in modern US politics.

NPD is one of several types of personality disorders. Personality disorders are conditions that cause people to feel and behave in socially distressing ways, limiting their ability to function in relationships and in other areas of their life. In particular, NPD is characterized by dramatic, emotional behavior, in the same category as histrionic, antisocial and borderline personality disorders.

Narcissism is related to Obsessive–Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) is often confused with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite the similar names, they are two distinct disorders. People experiencing OCPD do not generally feel the need to repeatedly perform ritualistic actions—a common symptom of OCD. OCPD is sometimes associated with eating disorders.

The primary causes of OCPD are time, personal and/or social relationships, cleanliness and/or tidiness, and money. Completion of a task or problem by an OCPD individual can be affected when excessive time is used in getting such to be considered "right". Personal and social relationships are often under serious strain because the OCPD individual insists on being in charge and the only one who knows what is "right."

There are few moral 'gray' areas for a person with fully developed OCPD; actions and beliefs are either completely right, or absolutely wrong with the OCPD individual always 'in the right'. As might be expected, interpersonal relationships are difficult because of the excessive demands placed on friends, romantic partners and children. OCPD people are authoritarian 'my way or the highway' types.

If you were raised by an NPD or OCPD parent, then you've been taught that the parent is always right and you're the one who's wrong. This is also true of the OCPD parent. OCPD is more subtle because people who have it are usually only apparent at home, but not at work.

It's impossible to overemphasize the narcissists' lack of empathy. They always fill in their knowledge gaps with bits of behavior, ideas, tastes, and opinions borrowed from someone else whom they regard as an authority. For instance, and narcissists' opinions may actually come from someone you know, too, but to you is obviously not an authority on the matter. Rush Limbaugh seems to be a favorite of many with NPD and OCPD.

People with NPD or OCPD often try to take one example and generalize to everyone else. In their words they look at one tree and suggest the entire forest is that way. Rush Limbaugh does this on his radio show all of the time. For example a caller was complaining about Canadian medical care.

The Canadian wanted to go to a facility that was 30 minutes away for cancer treatment, but the government made him travel to one that was 3.5 hours away. This is a problem, but in the bigger scheme of things, Canadian health care is rated 30th in the world by the World Health Organization and the US is 37th. Limbaugh rarely talks about the 'big picture' forest on his show.

Because their inner life of a narcissist is restricted, it doesn't contain images of how to live a full life -- these things are not important to them, they expect others to look after day-to-day chores, they resent wasting their specialness on common things. They don't put their heart into their work, but they will complain how many hours they put into their job. They borrow their opinions and preferences and tastes from whomever strikes them as authoritative at the moment.

Narcissists have problems with cause and effect. They do not seem not to make logical memory associations as others do.

Narcissists get worse as they get older, with dramatic regression after the deaths of their parents and other personal authority figures who have exerted some control over the narcissists' bad behavior. Chronic depression may be obvious by their forties. Depressed narcissists blame the world, but not themselves for their personal disappointments.

One young man told his family in his early teens that he was going to live on the beach, be a millionaire, have two cars and boat by the time he was 35. He was doing below average is school and did not seem to have any extraordinary abilities. He even made a bet for $50 with a relative that he would achieve all of these goals. At age 37 he was driving a 10 year old car, had never owned a home and was still living with his parents.

When his relative said “game over' and asked for the $50, the man insisted he would still be able to achieve his 'dream' and the game was still on. Many people had called this man a 'dreamer' when he was younger because he had so many delusions about himself. Of course, this 'dreamer is a Rush ditto head.

Narcissists never outgrow their demands for dedicated attention to their needs. Adult narcissists can be as demanding of your time and energy as babies but without the gratification of their growing or learning anything from what they suck from you. In a household the narcissists thinks the home revolves around them.

So, yes, it's possible to get along with narcissists, but it's probably not worth bothering with. If family members are narcissists, you have my deep sympathy. If people you work with are narcissists, you will be wise to keep an eye on them because they are logically flawed. They feel that the rules don't apply to them, and they will always cut corners and take short cuts wherever they think they can get away with it.

Controversy constantly swirls around narcissist as it has around Sarah Palin. Why do you think Palin has US$500,000 in legal bills to defend against ethics complaints? The reason is simple: narcissists and people with OCPD are very manipulative and they tend to overreact when someone challenges their viewpoint.

One protester showed up at a Sarah Palin event with a placard for the Alaskan Independence Party that her husband had been a member of. Palin wanted to make a big issue about it, but Steve Schmidt, the McCain campaign manger, advised her to ignore it.

Palin kept insisting on a response. Of course, she was having trouble seeing the forest through the trees because the election was about John McCain, not Sarah Palin. Palin functioned in the McCain campaign as if she were also running for president. She constantly became a thorn in the side of John McCain by making contradictory statements. For example, the McCain camp abandoned Michigan late in the campaign, but Palin indicated she wanted to continue to campaign in Michigan. Huh!

Narcissists are threatened and enraged by trivial disagreements, mistakes, and misunderstandings. If you continue to live or work with narcissists, expect to have to clean up after them, expect to lose friends over them, expect big trouble sooner or later. Sarah Palin bombed in the presidential election and John McCain didn't even mention her as a presidential contender on the Leno show for 2012.

Narcissism and OCPD are personality disorders and narcissists' personalities are disordered: they don't make sense! They are not concerned with logic and they are impulsive. Don't try to understand everything they do. Does anyone really understand why Sarah Palin impulsively resigned as Governor of Alaska?

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Republicans are white, uptight and out-of-sight

The headline is based on an old off-color joke.  The GOP, in fact, is white, uptight and out-of site.  If age and gender were factored in, it would the party of old white conservative men. Few minorities support the GOP.



http://www.gallup.com/video/118946/Republican-Party-Largely-Composed-White-Conservatives.aspx

 Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs

Thursday, June 25, 2009

US Republicans: barbarians at Washington's gate

19 June, 2009, 17:27

After eight straight years of calling the shots in Washington, the US Republican party is waging a vicious verbal assault on the new Democratic administration. But will the Obama-bashing backfire?

It might seem to some that the Republican Party should be very grateful to Barack Obama. After all, with a snap of his magisterial fingers the American president, especially considering his meteoric popularity, could instigate the ugliest trials since the communist witch-hunts of the McCarthy era.

The US Justice Department could decide what crime to bring down on the heads of the Republicans with the help of a roulette wheel to make the whole process seem less subjective. Step right up and take a spin of the wheel! Round and round it goes, where it stops nobody knows… Iraq War, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, outed CIA agent Valerie Plame, fudged security reports to bolster the claim for war, failure to prevent the attacks on 9/11, torture, Guantanamo Bay, extraordinary rendition flights, secret detention facilities in Europe, and loss of civil liberties in the homeland.

Instead of pushing themselves away from the political poker table and count their massive losses, the Republicans refuse to accept their defeat with grace.

Radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh brought the soup to an immediate boil days after Obama was sworn into office.

Asked to pen a 700-word essay for a “major publication” on his “hopes for US President Barack Obama,” the public personality retorted that he only needed four words.
Vladimir Kremlev for RT. 

I hope he fails,” Limbaugh sneered.

Meanwhile, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who seems to be getting more of the media spotlight than Joe Biden, the real American vice president. Cheney continues to lash out at the Obama administration.

Indeed, never before in the history of US politics has the ousted party been so vociferous in its condemnation of the newly elected government. But for the Republicans, the battle seems to be one over the history books as opposed to the present realities.

The Battle Royale, pumped up as the “Clash of Titans” by the media, hit US television screens at the end of May.

In his speech, President Obama blasted the decision by the Bush administration to detain prisoners on Guantanamo Bay, arguing that it was likely to create more terrorists.

“Instead of serving as a tool to counter terrorism, Guantanamo became a symbol that helped al Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause,” he said. “Indeed, the existence of Guantanamo likely created more terrorists around the world than it ever detained.”

But this brings up the tricky question for Obama: what to do with all of those prisoners that nobody wants in their backyards?

“We will seek to transfer some detainees to the same type of facilities in which we hold all manner of dangerous and violent criminals within our borders – namely, highly secure prisons that ensure public safety,” Obama said.

Two minutes after Obama finished his speech, Dick Cheney took to the podium at the American Enterprise Institute, a hawkish conservative think tank, to deliver his bitter reply.

“For all the partisan anger that still lingers, our administration will stand up well in history, not despite our actions after 9/11, but because of them,” he thundered.

Cheney said that there had been no attack on the United States in the 2,689 days after 9/11 because the Bush administration had “followed through” and “stayed true to our word” by going on the offensive. He called Obama’s strategy for tackling terrorism “recklessness cloaked in righteousness” that would leave America vulnerable to another attack.

The unprecedented public spectacle of a former vice president berating a sitting president sparked yet another unprecedented event: a comment on the unsightly public haggling from the head of the CIA.

CIA Director Leon Panetta commented to The New Yorker for an article in its June 22 issue that Cheney’s criticism of the Obama administration’s approach to terrorism almost suggests “he’s wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point.”

Asked if he agreed with Panetta’s statement, Vice President Joe Biden told NBC’s “Meet the Press” program that he did not wish to guess at the motive behind Cheney’s criticism.

“I think Dick Cheney’s judgement about how to secure America is faulty,” Biden said. “I think our judgment is correct.”

The Washington Village

Senator John McCain, who lost his bid for the presidency against Barack Obama, also weighed in on the “unfortunate” comments.

“Well, this is a big town and a small town,” McCain said in an interview with Fox News. “And people get to know each other over the years. Both Leon Panetta, as chief of staff at the White House, and Dick Cheney is holding many positions, including both of them having been members of Congress, of course they know each other well. And that’s why this statement of Director Panetta is so uncalled for and unfortunate. He knows better. He’s not a new guy in town.”

This is an incredible comment for a guy who almost became the leader of the United States.
McCain argues that Panetta had no right to criticize Cheney because “they know each other well.” Has Washington become so back-slapping buddy-buddy that it is no longer possible to challenge the views of individuals for no other reason than that they “know each other well.”

McCain characterizes Panetta as somebody who “knows better. He’s not a new guy in town.” This comment goes far at explaining the crisis that has gripped Washington: not enough “new guys in town” who are not afraid to criticize the same people that they might bump into at the local restaurant, or some other meeting place. Gosh, that would be so uncomfortable! Has Washington become so dizzy by the cloud of hubris that no criticism, even from that of close associates, is acceptable?

With friends like that, Washington certainly doesn’t need any more enemies.

Finally, even George W. Bush came out of retirement to offer his opinion of the whole terrorist matter, a theme that framed his entire presidency.

“I told you I’m not going to criticize my successor,” he said. “I’ll just tell you that there are people at Gitmo that will kill American people at a drop of a hat and I don’t believe that persuasion isn’t going to work. Therapy isn’t going to cause terrorists to change their minds.”

But perhaps the smartest words to come out of the Republican party, divided as it is between the neoconservatives and the conservatives, were delivered recently by Colin Powell, the former US Secretary of State.

“I think the Republican Party has to take a hard look at itself and decide what kind of party we are.”

That includes “sharing the wealth of the country not only with the rich but with the least advantaged in our country.”

Look to Colin Powell as the Republican Party’s answer to Barack Obama in 2012.

Robert Bridge, RT

Source: http://www.russiatoday.com/Politics/2009-06-19/US_Republicans___barbarians_at_Washington_s_gate.html

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs