The outcome of income inequality

Paul Krugman has an excellent editorial on this subject. Does income inequality cause a depression?

Rightardia thinks as Krugman that income inequality can be a factor. Income inequality does cause social instability. In fact,the Gini coefficient quantifies this and the US's is 46.8 in 2009.


Once the co-efficient reaches .5, social instability may follow. The US is almost there. If you think the Tea party and OWS protests are an aberration, think again!

Rightardia thinks supply side economics and the Bush tax cuts that followed are the cause of the income gap between the rich and poor. Has Obama done anything to fix income inequality?

Not much. His increases to the Food Stamp program (SNAP) helped. He also increased unemployment insurance payouts. But he also extended the Bush tax cuts after the GOP 112th Congress took power. His middle class tax cuts also helped.

Krugmans says this:

So how did that happen? For the past century, political polarization has closely tracked income inequality, and there’s every reason to believe that the relationship is causal. Specifically, money buys power, and the increasing wealth of a tiny minority has effectively bought the allegiance of one of our two major political parties, in the process destroying any prospect for cooperation.


Krugman concludes:

No, the real structural problem is in our political system, which has been warped and paralyzed by the power of a small, wealthy minority. And the key to economic recovery lies in finding a way to get past that minority’s malign influence.

graphic: http://www.nndb.com

sources:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/opinion/krugman-plutocracy-paralysis-perplexity.html?_r=1&ref=opinion#

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient#US_income_Gini_indices_over_time
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Al Jazeera English: The inequality that ate American democracy

"Ironically, this inequality gap is becoming deeply institutionalised at a time when America has its most nominally progressive president in decades. Barack Obama has spoken out against economic inequality but appears to lack the commitment or political means to reverse it.

The folks at Occupy Wall Street are no doubt saying, "I told you so", but even they may not appreciate how intractable the inequality is, and how it is fundamentally changing our society."

Rightrdia lost confidence in obama when he spent 15 months on the Affordable Health Care Act rather than fixing the tax system which was a big campaign promise. 

The Gini co-efficient for the US  is dangerously high at .46. Once the co-efficient reaches .50, social instability may result. the GINI index, has in fact increased while Obama was preidnet. 

The rise of the Tea party and OWS should be a wake-up call for both political parties. Watch for an increase in this sort of activity. 

source: The inequality that ate American democracy - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

graphic source: http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/

 Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.