UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label corporate welfare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporate welfare. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Steve Kangas Short FAQ on Liberlaism: What do liberals believe about welfare?



Welfare is necessary in a nation that intentionally keeps a 5-6 percent unemployment rate. (When unemployment dips below this, inflation starts to grow, and the Federal Reserve contracts the money supply to bring both inflation and unemployment back in line).

To tell welfare recipients therefore to just "get a job" is terrible economics, because it is literally impossible to reduce the unemployment rate to zero.

In March 1987, the General Accounting Office released a report that summarized more than one hundred studies of welfare since 1975.

It found that "research does not support the view that welfare encourages two-parent family breakup" or that welfare significantly reduces the incentive to work.

Conservatives also accuse welfare of giving mothers an economic incentive to have more children.

Ten major studies have been conducted on this issue in the last six years alone, and not one has found any connection between the level of payments offered and a woman's decision to bear children. The size of average welfare families is virtually the same as non-welfare families.

Because the poor cannot afford well-funded lobbyists in Washington, they make easy targets for budget cuts. Between 1970 and 1991, individual AFDC payments have declined 42 percent in real terms.

Today, AFDC takes up less than 1 percent of the combined government budgets. Meanwhile, corporate welfare is running $150 billion a year, three times the federal spending on AFDC and food stamps.

Steve Kangas is dead  but his ideas live on. Of course, Newt Gingrich congress got rid of AFDC when he was house speaker and replaced it with Temporary Assistance to needy  families  (TANF) which provides a lifetime 5 years of welfare payments to single mothers.


Is the US a welfare state? Hardly.

TANF is one of the reasons for the the rise of the  "for profit"""" "  schools. these schools provide training programs for the poor and working class people coming off of welfare and out of prison. Typically these schools will have a medical assistant program for females and a criminal justice (CJ) program for males. The top students who score high enough to be in an IT program.

Unfortunately these programs cost about twice as much as what a community college charges and students roll up $20,000 or more in student loans that they are unable to pay back. 

Why? Because many of the degrees are considered worthless and the credits earned are not transferable to public or private colleges. Most law enforcement agencies will not hire for profit CJ graduates.

To make matters worse a student loan cannot be discharged during bankruptcy. The student gets stuck holding the bag, 

It"s pointless to get an associate degree in medical assisting and then take a job at McDonald's for minimum wage. 

The Obama administration is trying cut off those schools that are unable to get appropriate employment for these unfortunate students. 
Creative Commons License 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA  
 
Netcraft rank: 5502 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
 
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Newt Gingrich admires GE for evading corporate income tax



Newt Gingrich said Friday that General Electrics aggressive legal and accounting strategy was a clever and rational response to the nation's high tax rates. 

General Electric hasn't paid corporate income taxes for years and during the Reagan administration GE was filing a 24,000 page tax form that IRS did not have the staff to audit.

GE is the largest corporation in the US. Its present tax tactic is for its subsidiaries file 7,000 corporate tax forms.  

GE earned a tax credit of $3.2 billion dollars  for 2010. Talk about corporate welfare!

Gingrich is an advocate of supply side economics and wants to restore the Bush tax cuts for billionaires and millionaires and also eliminate the estate tax state tax which is toothless to begin with

The estates of approximately 50,000 millionaires were exempted form the estate in a compromise withn the Boehener congress.

The Estate Tax was established by Theodore Roosevelt in 1915.

Gingrich also wants to reduce the corporate tax to 12.5 per cent which is identical to Ireland. The US corporate tax rate needs to be reduced but the exemptions also need to be eliminated.

According to the NY Times, two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005, according to a report released by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

Corporate revenues represented only 7.4 percent of all federal tax receipts in 2003. With the exception of 1983, this represents the lowest level on record (these data go back to 1934).

Obama plans to cut the corporate tax rate to 26 per cent, but also to eliminate exemptions. This should provide some more tax relief to the middle class. 

Tax revenues are a zero sum game. If the federal government can't collect enough to fund it programs, it must increase taxes or defund programs.Otherwise the deficit and national debt balloon.

source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/study-tallies-corporations-not-paying-income-tax/. and
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1311

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA   Netcraft rank: 5598 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.