UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label F-22. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F-22. Show all posts

Monday, March 19, 2012

Have American fighter aircraft lost their edge?



Uploaded by  on Jan 29, 2010

edited by The Major

The United States Department of Defense, the United States Air Force (USAF), the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and the US RAND Corporation Research and Development, US and Australia Pacific Vision data conducted a what Rightardia believes was a simulated notional command post exercise (CPX).

These exercises are often simulated by main frame computers that are programmed and directed by competing red and blue teams

The CPX PACAF Pacific Vision was conducted on Sept 25, 2008 revealed that United States air superiority was unlikely.

The Red Team had one hundred Su-27SM, four Su-30 and two Su-35. The Blue Team had one hundred F-35, one hundred eighty seven F-22 and four hundred F/A-18E/F.

The CPX showed although the blue team had a higher number of aircraft, hundreds of Blue Forces aircraft were lost in the first 20 minutes of air play to the Red Forces. On the other hand only 12 aircraft were lost by the Red Team.

The simulation results may have effected the production of the F-22 which was canceled. The F-35 project has also lost funds all since 2008.

Trials in Australia , which Rightardia suggests were simulated on computers, between 5th generation F-35 on the one hand and the current 4th generation Sukhoi SU-35, was a catastrophe for Blue forces. The F-35 was easy to shoot down according to some observers.

Australia, Canada and Japan are about to pull out from ab F-35 buy because "it can't turn, can't climb and can't run."

According to a recent study by the Rand corporation:

The F-35 would be consistently defeated by the Russian-made 
SU-35 fighter aircraft. The defeat calculated by the scenario also 
showed the loss of the F-35's supporting airborne-early warning and 
air-to-air refueling aircraft. 

The Russian-made T-50, PAK-FA low-observable fighter now in development is expected to be much more lethal than the SU-35 in air-to-air combat against the U.S. made F-35.

The SU-35 and T-50 made appearances this year at the Russian aerospace industry air show known as MAKS2011. Both aircraft will include sensors and networking which can minimise the effects of the limited low-observable qualities of the F-35. They will also perform better and carry more air-to-air weapons than an F-35.

Independent air combat analysts from Air Power Australia have also stated that the F-35 is not capable of facing high end threats; what will be delivered (if it ever arrives) will be obsolete; and that the F-35 is not affordable or sustainable."

Many American may be shocked by this report, but the results are based on a computer simulation that has many assumptions made about Russian aircraft performance and their pilot's capabilities. Rightardia suspects the PACAF CPXs have been run at least two more times since the original CPX in 2008.

Of interest, the Russian Mig-15 was superior to the fighter jet aircraft the US had in the beginning of the Korean War. The Mig-21 was also the best fighter aircraft in the Vietnam War. However, the US had the best pilots which kept the US Air Force competitive.

Today the Russian pilots are much better and probably equivalent to the US pilots in many respects. We have no idea on Chinese pilot proficiency. We hope we never find out, too. 




source: http://weapons.technology.youngester.com/2011/09/f-35-defeated-in-simulation-by-su-35.html 

posted in alt.politics by unk...@googlegroups.com 1 post 0 views updated 8:50 PM
The F-22 & F-35 proven USELESS compared to latest SUKHOI T-50 PAK FA or existing SU-35....

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Obama's Threatens Veto over F-22 appropriations

A bill designed to help troops on the frontlines has created a new frontline—on Capitol Hill. In spite of a vocal pro-fighter-jet contingent in Congress, President Obama has long argued that funds used to manufacture F-22s would be better spent providing troops with more useful weapons and equipment.

On Wednesday, the president announced that he will veto a pending $680 billion defense spending bill for fiscal year 2010 if lawmakers allocate funding for more F-22 fighter jets than the Defense Department has requested. "The administration strongly objects to the provisions in the bill authorizing $1.75 billion for seven F-22s in FY 2010," the White House said. Obama's intervention in the hot-button debate over ending the F-22 program has heightened pressure on lawmakers to respect his military priorities.

The Secretary of Defense bill Gates wanted the F-22 cutbacks. The Lockheed Martin F-22, has requires more than 30 hours of maintenance for every hour in the skies, pushing its hourly cost of flying to more than $44,000, a far higher figure than for the warplane it replaces, confidential Pentagon test results show.

Structural problems forced retrofits to the frame. Computer flaws and defective software diagnostics forced the debugging of millions of lines of code. 

Stealth skin problems required re-gluing small surfaces that can take more than a day to dry according to the Pentagon’s independent Office of Operational Test and Evaluation.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga, wants the additional F22s to be procured because they are being built by Lockheed Martin in Georgia. 

source: The Daily Beast - The Morning Scoop - July 16, 2009

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/cobb/stories/2009/07/10/F_22_maintenance_marietta.html

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 44637