UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label CBO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CBO. Show all posts

Monday, June 4, 2012

The Washington Post: The CBO takes on income inequality


The incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent have nearly tripled since the late 1970s. 
Everyone else? Not so much.
The chart sets the scene. 
The after-tax incomes of the middle class (the 21st to 80th percentiles) have grown at about 1 percent per year since 1979, adjusting for inflation. 
The incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent, meanwhile, have zoomed upward at a consderably faster pace.

 Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Creative Commons License
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Bloomberg: CBO warning



May 23 (Bloomberg) -- The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said May 22 the U.S. economy could be thrown back into recession in early 2013 if the slated across-the-board spending cuts and expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts take place as scheduled.

Michael McKee reports on Bloomberg Television's "Bottom Line."

Undoubtedly the Republicans will spin this information differently than the Democrats. Rightardia is skeptical that tax cuts that primarily affect the most affluent Americans like the estate tax will put a drag on the economy. 


We do no form the recent European experience with austerity that it does not work. 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Ryan Plan is seeped in class warfare


What did you expect from frat boy, Paul Ryan, defense cuts?

The DCCC reports:

House Republican Budget Would Give People Making Over $1 Million Per Year a $394,000 Tax Cut. “New analysis by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC) finds that people earning more than $1 million a year would receive $265,000 apiece in new tax cuts, on average, on top of the $129,000 they would receive from the Ryan budget’s extension of President Bush’s tax cuts.” [Center for Budget and Policy Priorities,3/27/12; see also Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Table T12-0078 and T10-0132]
source: Daily Kos

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Monday, February 20, 2012

DCCC: Paul Ryan falsely claims payroll tax cut doesn't work


On NBC’s Meet the Press today, Republican Budget Chairman Paul Ryan falsely claimed that the payroll tax cut doesn’t work. Ryan said:
I don’t think this works to grow our economy” and compared the payroll tax cut to “sugar-high economics.

In reality, independent economists like former John McCain economic advisor Mark Zandi said blocking the payroll tax cut for 160 million middle income Americans would trigger an economic recession and could cost nearly 1 million American jobs. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office found that extending the payroll tax cut is more cost effective to promote economic growth and employment than the tax breaks for the ultra wealthy that Ryan and House Republicans support.
Mark Zandi's chart: note the payroll tax holiday returns $1.29
FACT CHECK

Mark Zandi: Payroll Tax Cut Needed to Avoid Recession
. “Failure to extend a payroll tax holiday into 2012 could trigger another recession, noted U.S. economist Mark Zandi said on Thursday, as Democrats called the extension a top priority needing quick action.” [Reuters, 10/6/11]

Reducing Payroll Taxes on Firms Creates More Jobs Than Tax Cuts for the Wealthy. In January 2010, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office wrote that reducing payroll taxes for firms was among the policies “that would have the largest effect on output and employment per dollar on budgetary cost in 2010 and 2011. By contrast, policies that would temporarily increase the after-tax income of people with relatively high income, such as an across-the-board reduction in income taxes […] would have a smaller effects because such tax cuts would probably not affect the recipients’ spending significantly.” [Congressional Budget Office, 1/10]
T
Congressional Budget Office: Reducing Employers’ Payroll Taxes, Increasing Unemployment Aid Will Have Bigger Impact on Employment Than Other Proposals. “Policies that would have the largest effects on output and employment per dollar of budgetary cost in 2012 and 2013 are ones that would reduce the marginal cost to businesses of adding employees or that would be targeted toward people who would be most likely to spend the additional income. Such policies include reducing employers’ payroll taxes (especially if limited to firms that increase their payroll), increasing aid to the unemployed, and providing additional refundable tax credits in 2012 for lower- and middle-income households.” [Congressional Budget Office, 11/15/11]

National Federation of Independent Business: Payroll Tax Holiday Can Create Jobs. The National Federation of Independent Business has said that a payroll tax holiday for small businesses would help “struggling businesses reduce costs” and “can reduce unemployment and keep people working during a period of slowed economic growth.” [NFIB, accessed 9/16/11]

Republican Budget Chairman Paul Ryan Called Extending the Payroll Tax Cut “Sugar-High” Economics.House Budget Committee Chairman Ryan “rejected the idea of making further short-term changes to the payroll tax” and called payroll tax cuts “sugar-high economics.” [The Hill, 6/16/11]

Rightardia considers Paul Ryan a clueless frat boy who will say what the Establishment Republicans tell him to say. Curiously, his name is being as one of the "stand in nominees" if Mittens doesn't make the cut by convention time in Tampa. 


Jeb Bush and Chris Christie's names are also on that list. 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Health Insurance Reform Daily Mythbuster: Impact on the Deficit

August 5th, 2009 by Karina

Health insurance reform opponents, including Republican Congressman Mike Pence of Indiana, continue to spread myths about America’s Affordable Health Choices Act’s effect on the deficit.

Myth: “The American people know what government-run health care will mean: … bigger deficit…” – Congressman Mike Pence, 7/28/09
Fact: The nonpartisan CBO found America’s Affordable Health Choices Act is deficit neutral.
The CBO released estimates confirming that the health insurance reform policies of America’s Affordable Health Choices Act are deficit-neutral over the 10-year budget window — even producing a $6 billion surplus. CBO estimated that the cost of the bill’s insurance reforms was $1.042 trillion, while the bill’s cost savings and revenues totaled $1.048 trillion:

CBO Estimates
CBO estimated that these reforms will provide affordable coverage for 97 percent of Americans two years after the program starts.
In addition, the President has said:
I’ve also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade. And I mean it… [health insurance reform] will be paid for.
http://speaker.house.gov/blog/
Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 19798 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=BE281D838226A4DAC11D0E201A0E#19798