UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label Blue Cross. Health Care Stories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blue Cross. Health Care Stories. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2009

Intrade: Health Care a 50:50 proposition and GOP to stonewall Sotomayor

According to Intrade public health care is about a 50:50 proposition.

Sonia Sotomayor's numbers have been sinking like a rock. She will be confirmed but with less than 75 votes.

http://www.intrade.com/

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 30670

Friday, July 17, 2009

Glen Beck had melt down on the air



Glen Beck acted childishly on the air. US health care cost twice as much as the other industrial nations of the world. Right now it is consuming 18 per cent of the GDP and is projected to go to 20 per cent, twice as much as the other industrial nations of the world.

Worse, one if five Americans has no health care coverage and pre-existing conditions prevent many Americans from getting health care insurance.

For the years 2003 and 2004, just over 50 percent of all personal bankruptcies were the result of medical debt by those with health insurance. 


The US needs a public health care system. In the UK it cost US$600 per year for public health insurance and 88 per cent of the citizens use public health care. The World Health Organization (WHO) rates 18th in the world. France is rated number one and Canada is 30th. The US is rated 37th. 


Clearly our system can be improved and made more cost effective. 


Source: http://www.bcsalliance.com/y_debt_medical.html


Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 44637

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Costs Of Healthcare Americans spend about 6% of their personal income on healthcare.

Introduction

By several measures, health care spending continues to rise at a rapid rate and forcing businesses and families to cut back on operations and household expenses respectively.

In 2008, total national health expenditures were expected to rise 6.9 percent -- two times the rate of inflation.1 Total spending was $2.4 TRILLION in 2007, or $7900 per person. Total health care spending represented 17 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).

U.S. health care spending is expected to increase at similar levels for the next decade reaching $4.3 TRILLION in 2017, or 20 percent of GDP.

In 2008, employer health insurance premiums increased by 5.0 percent – two times the rate of inflation. The annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $12,700. The annual premium for single coverage averaged over $4,700.2

Experts agree that our health care system is riddled with inefficiencies, excessive administrative expenses, inflated prices, poor management, and inappropriate care, waste and fraud. These problems significantly increase the cost of medical care and health insurance for employers and workers and affect the security of families.

National Health Care Spending

* In 2008, health care spending in the United States reached $2.4 trillion, and was projected to reach $3.1 trillion in 2012.1 Health care spending is projected to reach $4.3 trillion by 2016.1
* Health care spending is 4.3 times the amount spent on national defense.
* In 2008, the United States will spend 17 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care. It is projected that the percentage will reach 20 percent by 2017.
* Although nearly 46 million Americans are uninsured, the United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations, and those countries provide health insurance to all their citizens.
* Health care spending accounted for 10.9 percent of the GDP in Switzerland, 10.7 percent in Germany, 9.7 percent in Canada and 9.5 percent in France, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.4

Employer and Employee Health Insurance Costs

* Premiums for employer-based health insurance rose by 5.0 percent in 2008. In 2007, small employers saw their premiums, on average, increase 5.5 percent. Firms with less than 24 workers, experienced an increase of 6.8 percent.2
* The annual premium that a health insurer charges an employer for a health plan covering a family of four averaged $12,700 in 2008. Workers contributed nearly $3,400, or 12 percent more than they did in 2007.2 The annual premiums for family coverage significantly eclipsed the gross earnings for a full-time, minimum-wage worker ($10,712).
* Workers are now paying $1,600 more in premiums annually for family coverage than they did in 1999.
* Since 1999, employment-based health insurance premiums have increased 120 percent, compared to cumulative inflation of 44 percent and cumulative wage growth of 29 percent during the same period.
* Health insurance expenses are the fastest growing cost component for employers. Unless something changes dramatically, health insurance costs will overtake profits by the end of 2008.
* According to the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust, premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance in the United States have been rising four times faster on average than workers’ earnings since 1999.
* The average employee contribution to company-provided health insurance has increased more than 120 percent since 2000. Average out-of-pocket costs for deductibles, co-payments for medications, and co-insurance for physician and hospital visits rose 115 percent during the same period.6
* The percentage of Americans under age 65 whose family-level, out-of-pocket spending for health care, including health insurance, that exceeds $2,000 a year, rose from 37.3 percent in 1996 to 43.1 percent in 2003 – a 16 percent increase.7


The Impact of Rising Health Care Costs

* National surveys show that the primary reason people are uninsured is the high cost of health insurance coverage.
* Economists have found that rising health care costs correlate to drops in health insurance coverage.
* A recent study by Harvard University researchers found that the average out-of-pocket medical debt for those who filed for bankruptcy was $12,000. The study noted that 68 percent of those who filed for bankruptcy had health insurance. In addition, the study found that 50 percent of all bankruptcy filings were partly the result of medical expenses. Every 30 seconds in the United States someone files for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a serious health problem.
* A new survey shows that more than 25 percent said that housing problems resulted from medical debt, including the inability to make rent or mortgage payments and the development of bad credit ratings.10
* About 1.5 million families lose their homes to foreclosure every year due to unaffordable medical costs.
* A survey of Iowa consumers found that in order to cope with rising health insurance costs, 86 percent said they had cut back on how much they could save, and 44 percent said that they have cut back on food and heating expenses.
* Retiring elderly couples will need $250,000 in savings just to pay for the most basic medical coverage.13 Many experts believe that this figure is conservative and that $300,000 may be a more realistic number.
* According to a recent report, the United States has $480 billion in excess spending each year in comparison to Western European nations that have universal health insurance coverage. The costs are mainly associated with excess administrative costs and poorer quality of care.
* The United States spends six times more per capita on the administration of the health care system than its peer Western European nations.14



Time for Action on Reining in Health Care Costs

Policymakers and government officials agree that health care costs must be controlled. But they disagree on the best ways to address rapidly escalating health spending and health insurance premiums. Some favor price controls and imposing strict budgets on health care spending. Others believe free market competition is the best way to solve the problems. Public health advocates believe that if all Americans adopted healthy lifestyles, health care costs would decrease as people required less medical care.

There appears to be no agreement on a single solution to health care’s high price tag. Many approaches may be used to control costs. What we do know is if the rate of escalation in health care spending and health insurance premiums continues at current trends, the cost of inaction will severely affect employer’s bottom lines and consumer’s pocketbooks.

© 2009 National Coalition on Health Care. All rights reserved

Source: http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

The National Coalition
on Health Care
1120 G Street, NW,
Suite 810
Washington, DC 20005

202.638.7151

www.nchc.org
info@nchc.org

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com Subscribe to the Rightardia feed:

feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu Netcraft rank: 66069

Thursday, July 9, 2009




Scott
Nc_60 My wife and I are in our 30's with one 7 month old boy. I'm self-employed and my wife is a paralegal. She gets much of her insurance covered by the law firm she works at thankfully. However in the 2 months she was in between jobs looking for employment she searched for a temporary plan. Because of her autoimmune disease the insurance companies wanted to charge her $800 a month for coverage. She only visits the doctor's office 5 times a year. The costs of health insurance have gotten unrealistic.

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs

Netcraft rank: 66069

Wednesday, July 1, 2009





Picture_1_medium 
I just got off the phone with my health insurance company. I had just received an Explanation of Benefits showing my deductible was not met, and a bill from a doctor showing that I owed the whole thing.

Now this seemed curious. I have breast cancer and have already been through multiple imaging procedures, surgery, installation of a portacath and the first round of chemo. My deductible was met a long time ago.

The explanation? I have two deductibles on my plan, one for “in plan” and one for “out of plan.” I’d seen my dermatologist for an issue unrelated to the cancer, a doctor I’ve been seeing for over 15 years as insurance arrangements have come and gone in my life. Apparently she’s “out of plan.

There are lots of, shall we say, nuances to health insurance coverage that you won’t know until you try to use it. In my late twenties, that is, roughly 28-33 years ago, I maintained a private health insurance policy. I originally got it during a period when I didn’t have employer provided health insurance, and it seemed like a good idea to just keep it going; it was a good deal.

I don’t remember how much it started out at, but I remember it costing about $16/month just before the insurance mergers began and premiums started to skyrocket. It was through Blue Shield, which tended to pay 100% of doctor fees and 80% of hospital fees. Employer provided health insurance was generally through Blue Cross, which tended to pay 80% of doctor fees and 100% of hospital fees.

And they didn’t coordinate benefits, so when I had some shoulder surgery in 1980, not only was it all paid, but I also got some nice refunds. Really. Ah, surgery in the old days. They “let” me come in the morning of the surgery instead of spending the preceding night in the hospital because my doctor trusted me not to eat too close to the surgery.

I met the anesthesiologist well before the time when he hooked me up, and he checked on me back in my room after I was fully awake. (My dad was an anesthesiologist. They used to “make rounds” of both pre- and post-surgical patients in the hospital.) They kept me in the hospital for two nights.

Fast forward to May, 2009. My insurance premium is $369/month, and no I don’t make anything like 2300% of what I did then. The day of the surgery I arrived about noon for some additional imaging procedures before being admitted to the short stay unit. I think the actual operation was in the late afternoon, removing a substantial chunk of breast and a bunch of lymph nodes and inserting a drain.

I had a tough time coming out of the anesthetic in recovery and didn’t get back to a room until about 9 PM. Also had a rough night, including a nasty reaction to a pain med, but in the morning I was sent on my way after a quick lesson in caring for the drain. And I don’t know how I am going to pay the rest of the bills. The first one marked “past due” arrived yesterday, and it’s for well over $2,000, and that’s just the start.

And it’s not as if my other bills are going to be suspended just because I’m sick. My point is, it’s hard to get at the whole story on the numbers here. Not only am I paying 23 times as much for health insurance premiums as I did 29 years ago, I’m also paying (or trying to pay) an enormous amount more in co-pays, deductibles and other non-covered fees.

And most years I pay for all of my medical care out of pocket because my deductibles are not met. The health insurance industry has managed to contort any concept of rational health care funding beyond recognition. We don’t really have an “insurance” system, in which you pay regular premiums but when you get sick you get taken care of.

We don’t really have a “savings” system in which you pay into an account that you can use to pay your bills. It’s not that it’s a hybrid, but that it’s neither. We pay regular premiums, maybe for years on end that we don’t see a dime back.

And we are still subject to bankrupting bills when we get sick. Meanwhile, doctors and nurses work in assembly line environments in which they are expected to minimize their time with each patient. They enter their professions with far more debt and are far less well compensated than they were even a few years ago.

Where is all the money going? More tests and expensive equipment? Sure, but that’s not enough. A lot of the money we pay for health care goes missing between the premium payers and the providers.

Somewhere along the line, health insurance exited the health system and became part of the financial system. It is now not so much a means of paying for health care as an excuse to disappear money into the black hole of an extraction economy.

Just as Enron figured out that selling nothing for something was the ticket to incredible profits, just as the banking industry figured out that Ponzi was its patron saint, health insurers figured out that the route to incredible profits was to charge a captive market whatever they could get away with and then minimize payouts. As soon as their mission was narrowed to producing profits, all practices that furthered that were justified. As far as they are concerned, when we talk about “fairness” we are speaking in irrelevancies.

Their reason for being is to spread obligation and loss far and wide in order to concentrate wealth for a few. And they do it well. Because a captive market is the key to their success, they will fight like hell for the status quo. They should be told to be happy they’re not being prosecuted under RICO. And then we should move on.

The survival of the insurance industry should be the new irrelevancy. No matter what happens to health reform in this country, I may still lose everything due to this illness, if only due to timing.

But it's past time to put a stop to that.

Source:  http://stories.barackobama.com/healthcare/stories/187439

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Contact Rightardia: eelder1@gmail.com

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/blogspot/Onjs