UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label 2010 elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010 elections. Show all posts

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Club of Rome predicts Democratic comeback in 2012


By Markos Moulitsas Zniga
posted November 8, 2010 at 9:05 am EST
Berkeley, Calif.


The 2010 elections have come and gone, and Democrats found out what happens when they neglect their base and fail to deliver jobs for the American people.

First things first, the exit polls tell us what this election was not. It was not an embrace of the Republican Party.

As counterintuitive as it sounds, the voter opinion of the Republican Party (42 percent favorable) was less favorable than that of the Democratic Party (43 percent favorable). Yet 23 percent of those who viewed the GOP unfavorably still voted for them anyway.

While 35 percent of voters believed that Wall Street was to blame for the terrible economy, that cohort still voted for Republicans by a 56 to 42 margin.

It s a GOP con of masterful proportions embrace Wall Street and its money, yet still win the votes of the financial industry s biggest critics.

Of the 47 percent of voters who want the health care law as is or even expanded, 44 percent of them voted Republican. The GOP, of course, has made repeal of the law a central tenet of its agenda.

And of the 37 percent of voters who felt the next Congress s highest priority should be more government spending to create jobs, 30 percent voted for Republicans. Boy, will that bunch be disappointed! Voters had to punish someone

Bottom line: Democrats didn't lose because Republicans are suddenly popular, or people embrace their agenda. Democrats lost because people are angry and desperate and flailing and had to punish someone for the nation's economic woes.

Of course, it didn t help that core Democratic voters didn t turn out in the necessary numbers.

The 2008 electorate was 74 percent white, 13 percent black, and 9 percent Latino. This week, it was 78, 10, and 8 percent, respectively.

That s a four-point swing in favor of white voters. That doesn t sound like much, but it s an extra net 3.6 million white votes. And given whites voted Republican by a 60 to 37 margin, that was 2.2 million votes banked by Republicans in a contest that featured myriad tight races.

Flip just 150,000 votes in Pennsylvania and Illinois, and the Democrats hold both those Senate seats.

In addition, the white voters most likely to vote Democratic the millennials suffered from depressed turnout. In 2008, 18-to-29-year-olds made up 18 percent of the electorate, while those 65-plus made up 16 percent. More youngsters voted than seniors.

This year, the young cohort was down to 11 percent, while seniors were a whopping 23 percent of the electorate. That's a 24-point flip, significant because the youngsters voted Democratic 57 to 40, while the seniors opted GOP by a 59 to 38 margin. Weak turnout hurt Democrats a lot more.

Without the core Democratic base at the polls, conservatives dominated the electorate, making up 41 percent of voters.

In 2008, they were 34 percent of the total. Given that even moderates opted strongly for Democrats by a 55 to 42 margin this election, their relative scarcity compared to fired up conservatives wasn t enough to offset those massive Republican gains . . .

Now, this new GOP-led House will make sure that nothing of note passes, and will try to gum up the works further with investigations into President Obama s birth certificate and other such insanities.

There's nothing Democrats can do about that, but with power comes responsibilit , and presumptive Speaker John Boehner will be under pressure to walk the line between the ideological purity his tea party base demands, and the pragmatism of governing. When he fails (and he will), Democrats need to be ready to pounce.

The last three cycles have proven that the House can swing wildly from extreme to extreme. We truly have an angry, downright schizophrenic electorate, ready to take out its frustrations on whomever is in power.

The Democrats took the brunt of that anger in 2010. Unless they help turn things around in America, Republicans shouldn t get too comfortable in their new congressional digs before 2012. Especially in a year when the Democratic base will turn out.

For more information on the Club of rome, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_of_Rome

Source: From: Werner
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 20 2010 4:27 pm
Subject: Uber Libertarian Club Of Rome Think Tank Predicts A 2nd Obama Term As Republicans Fail To Turn The Bush Recession Around And Lose Their Majority

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 8515

http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Carl “Glory Hole” Paladino’s Last Shot?


it sure looks like Carl is toast after his anit-gay comments backfired on him. So is Christine O'Donnell. Intrade gives her less than a 10 per cent chance of winning. 


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 

Netcraft rank: 8377 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Intrade mid-term election predictions


The Democrats are facing a mixed bag in November. Rand Paul is expected to win in Tennessee but the Democrats will win many of the other high profile races. As long as the Democrats hold the Senate and the presidency, the Republicans in the House will be stymied.

Intrade predictions are accurate and rightrdia will be watching them as America approaches the mod-terms. 

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 

Netcraft rank: 8377 
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Huffington Post: Political Scientists Forecast Big Losses For Democrats In 2010 Midterm Elections

First Posted: 09- 6-10 02:54 PM | Updated: 09- 6-10 07:55 PM
With the midterm elections now just nine weeks away, a group of political scientists gathered for a conference in Washington D.C. this weekend forecast significant losses for the Democrats. Three of the five forecasts predicted that Republicans will gain majority control of the House of Representatives.

The annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), which featured nearly 5,000 participants and close to 900 panel and round table sessions, was about far more than election forecasting. Many attended a Saturday session in which five political scientists presented the latest results from their forecasting models, some of which have been in development for 30 years or more.

Democrats currently hold a 256 to 179 seat advantage, so Republicans need to win at least 39 seats to gain majority control. Three of the models, two of which draw on national polls measuring whether voters plan to support the Democrat or Republican candidate in their district, point to Republicans picking up between 49 and 52 seats in the House, more than enough to win majority control.

* Alan Abramowitz of Emory University forecast a Republican gain of 49 seats, based on current polling showing Republican with a roughly five percentage-point lead on the generic House ballot.

* Joe Bafumi of Dartmouth College presented his forecast of a 50-seat Republican gain, based on a model and paper co-authored with Robert Erikson of Columbia University and Chris Wlezien of Temple University (and summarized last month in the Huffington Post). Their model also rests heavily on national polling on U.S. House vote preferences.

* James Campbell of SUNY Buffalo predicted a gain of 50 to 52 seats for the Republicans, using a model that combines assessments of the number of "seats in peril" by the Cook Political Report with the recent job approval rating of president Barack Obama.

Two more models offered a less pessimistic outlook for the Democrats:

* Alfred Cuzan forecast a Republican gain of 27 to 30 seats based on a model, developed with University of West Florida colleague Charles Bundrick, that relies mostly on measures of economic growth and inflation rather than voter preference polling.

* Michael Lewis Beck of the University of Iowa predicted a Republic gain of just 22 seats. He collaborated with Charles Tien of CUNY Hunter College on a more than 30-year-old "referendum" model based on measurements earlier this year. Their model was the only one to exclude measurements of the current seat division between Democrats and Republicans.

Why so much variation in the forecasts? Another speaker, Gary Jacobson of the University of California San Diego, pointed out that the number of previous elections typically used by forecasters (typically between 16 and 32) is "not a very big number," while a great many "plausible" predictive measures exist.

Jacobson also noted the differences between the "fundamentalist" models of Cuzan/Bundrick and Lewis-Beck/Tien that assume that views of the the economy and the Obama administration drive voting.

Other models use vote preference questions which, as he put it, "add in the information that's already the product of these fundamentals" as well as "the other stuff that's going on" with voter preferences.

Lewis-Beck argued that the "the best models are based on theory ... things that we know [or] that we're pretty certain we know," which in this case means the belief that "people vote about the main direction of the economy, and they vote about big macro political issues."

Rightardia has seen some Democratic correspondence suggesting that Democratic activists need to hang in there to do the 'heavy lifting." Our view is to let the GOP have the mess they created back. 

It appears that the US House is lost. The best thing that Democrats can do is help deserving local Democratic candidates and shift resources to the Senate races. As long as the Democrats can hold onto 40 or more seats in the Senate, we can stymie GOP legislation and 'return the favor." Democrats shouldn't get mad, they should get even!


Obama wasted time trying to be bi-partisan. He should have spent more time doing the 'heavy lifting' like rescinding the Bush tax cuts which now in unlikely to happen. He should have one ugly early with budget reconciliations instead of spending a year on health care that polarized the nation.


Here we are on the eve of a national elections trying to hash out a peace agreement with Israel and the PLA, two bitter enemies. the PLA does not even represent the Palestinian people. Hamas won the elections in Palestine. What a waste of time!


Another reason we won't contribute any more money to the House is that we know the "Blue Dogs" will collaborate with the GOP if Republicans take the House. We think the best place to draw the line in the sand ins the US Senate.


If any one has a different view on where to put Democratic resources, we would like to hear from you.

Donate to the DSCC

See the rest of the story at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/06/political-scientists-fore_n_706643.html


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 9157 
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com


Sunday, July 25, 2010

Ann Coulter: Close doesn't count in the House and Senate


No one can ever accuse Ann Coulter of telling people what they want to hear. Yesterday during a Fox News roundtable in which participants, including Fox’s resident Dem analyst Kirsten Powers, roundly concluded the Dems prospects this November are very dim.

Ann Coulter interjected with some cold reality.

Close doesn’t count, and if we don’t pick up those seats…I mean, ooh, maybe Boxer’s in a close race, but this isn’t a good year for the Republicans in the Senate. There are as many Democrats as Republicans are up in the Senate, only a third of the Senate is up every year, so I think Republicans ought to be careful with all this rah, rah cheering. 

We’re not going to take the Senate. Even if we pick up 30 seats in the House, we’re not taking the House. 

Intrade ratings shows both Reid and Boxer winning their races. 


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 14896
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Sunday, May 2, 2010

10 reasons for voting Republican in 2010




  1. You like to pay twice as much for health insurance as the rest of the world does.
  2. You think the rich deserve tax cuts more than the middle class because you miss all of that 'trickle down ' cash.
  3. You think the economy will fail because the US is not starting any new wars.
  4. You think your family will be better off if Republican politicians, who work for corporations, are in power.
  5. You trust the government less than the corporation who laid you off or the bank who tried to foreclose on your sub prime mortgage.
  6. You like Sarah Palin and her “drill, baby drill” slogan even though the US just suffered its worst environmental disaster in history in the Gulf of Mexico when A BP oil rig exploded.
  7. Although you are unemployed and face foreclosure next month, you think Arizona immigration is a more important issue than the collapse of the US economy and US worker unemployment.
  8. You think there may be constitutional issues with a black man being President of the United States.
  9. You were really offended when Speaker Nancy Pelosi called George W. Bush “an incompetent leader.”
  10. You think 66 weeks is more than enough time for Obama and the federal government to fix the economic train-wreck that the Bush administration created in the previous 8 years.
Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Newsy: Big shift unlikely in 2010 elections


January 5, 2010 3:11
 
Democrats and Republicans are preparing for mid-term elections. Does either side have the winning message for a landslide victory?
 
Rightardia comment: Intrade Prediction Markets indicates the Democrats will hold onto the House and in the Senate the Democrats may lose 3-4 seats.  We will continue to watch the Intrade predictions closely.


Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 4347 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com