UA-9726592-1
Showing posts with label Wall Street. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wall Street. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Sweet Jesus, what a sight for sore eyes

Jesus drives the investment bankers from Wall Street.

This is more accurate view of Jesus than men like Joel Osteen have, who push Christian prosperity.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA

Creative Commons License


Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.


Monday, May 14, 2012

Was Wall Street appreciative of the TARP2 bail out?


Think again!

There is little love on wall street for the Democratic Party regardless of what some of the Mitt Romney mis-advertisements are suggesting.

source: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/matt-taibbi-cant-believe-wall-street-donors-have-dried-up-for-obama/

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA
Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

Monday, February 7, 2011

NMA explains the US mortgage meltdown



America is still mired in the Great Recession, but the people responsible for the mess have elected to award themselves a record-high $144 billion in compensation and benefits for 2010.
 
It's capitalism's finest hour. This video has golden parachutes in it and even scenes from Florida mortgage foreclosure courtrooms.

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

Netcraft rank: 6699 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com




Creative Commons License
Rightardia by Rightard Whitey of Rightardia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at rightardia@gmail.com.

2004 SEC Rule Change led to the Wall St. Meltdown

From the:: atakante :: blog: It seems that a 2004 rule change authorized by SEC, (Securities and Exchange Commission) which is tasked to regulate U.S. financial markets may have provided the highly flammable fuel that eventually led to the massive fire at Wall St. brokerage headquarters.
The rule change granted permission to Bear Sterns, Lehman, Merrill, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs AND NONE OTHER to assume a new designation that would let them lever their portfolios by a ratio of up to 1 to THIRTY(30)!

It effectively replaced the old rule put in place in 1970s limiting the same ratio to 1 to 12. Especially interesting quote in the press release is that of then SEC Commissioner Harvey Goldschmid who said:

If anything goes wrong, it's going to be an awfully big mess.

Rightardia covered this story nearly two years ago. This is the "smokin gun" that directly ties the Bush Adminstration into the Wall Street melt down. Paulson had been a partner in Goldman-Sachs at the time. He eventually became the Goldman-Sachs CEO .

According to Wikipedia: 

In 2004, at the request of the major Wall Street investment houses—including Goldman Sachs, then headed by Henry Paulson—the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission agreed unanimously to release the major investment houses from the net capital rule, the requirement that their brokerages hold reserve capital that limited their leverage and risk exposure.
GW Bush and Henry Paulson

The investment banks complained of increasingly onerous regulatory requirements of the European Union regulation over the foreign operations of U.S. investment groups.

In the immediate lead-up to the decision, EU regulators acceded to U.S. pressure, and agreed not to scrutinize foreign firms' reserve holdings if the SEC agreed to do so instead.

The 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, however, put the parent holding company of each of the big American brokerages beyond SEC oversight. In order for the agreement to go ahead, the investment banks lobbied for a decision that would allow "voluntary" inspection of their parent and subsidiary holdings by the SEC.

The Republican Congress rescinded the depression-era Glass-Stegall Act. President Bill Clinton unwisely signed this bad act into law.

Phil Gramm was identified by Time Magazine as the number two man behind Alan Greensapn who was responsible for the meltdown.

At the time Democratic Senator Byron Dornan predicted a financial collapse would occur in 10 years after 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act became law. He was right on the money.


The repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933 effectively removed the separation that previously existed between Wall Street investment banks and depository banks and has been blamed by for exacerbating the damage caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market that led to the Financial crisis of 2007–2010. 

During this repeal of the net capital rule, SEC Chairman William H. Donaldson agreed to the establishment of a risk management office that would monitor signs of future problems.

This office was eventually dismantled by Chairman Christopher Cox, after discussions with Paulson.

According to The New York Times, "While other financial regulatory agencies criticized a blueprint by Treasury Secretary Mr. Paulson proposing to reduce their stature and that of the S.E.C.

Mr. Cox did not challenge the plan.  Three former Democratic and Republican commission chairmen complained that the new blueprint would "neuter the agency."


In late September 2008, Chairman Cox and the other Commissioners agreed to end the 2004 program of voluntary regulation.

It is peculiar after the Wall street disaster that Republicans are still calling for more deregulation and privatization.

What does deregulation and privatization ultimately produce? That would be an unregulated private monopoly.

This is a dangerous development. If we have learned anything from the earlier Savings and Loan scandal and the Wall Street meltdown, it is the government needs to be actively involved with he regulation of investment banks and similar monopolies.

If the government decides to privatize an industry, regulatory oversight is clearly needed.

sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Paulson#Goldman_Sachs and http://www.atakante.com/2008/09/2004-sec-rule-change-and-wall-st.html

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/UFPYA 

Netcraft rank: 6497 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

Thursday, May 20, 2010

ABC News: Senate Passes Historic Wall Street Regulation Bill

By JIM KUHNHENN Associated Press Writer |WASHINGTON May 20, 2010 (AP)

Prodded by national anger at Wall Street, the Senate passed the most far-reaching restraints on big banks since the Great Depression. In its broad sweep, the massive bill would touch Wall Street CEOs and first-time home buyers, high-flying traders and small town lenders.

The 59-39 vote represents an important achievement for President Barack Obama, and comes just two months after his health care overhaul became law. The bill must now be reconciled with a House version that passed in December. The legislation Should reach Obama's desk before the Fourth of July.

The legislation aims to prevent another meltdown of big Wall Street investment banks and the resulting costly bailouts. It calls for new ways to watch for risks in the financial system and makes it easier to liquidate large failing financial firms. It also writes new rules for complex securities blamed for helping precipitate the 2008 economic crisis. It ALSO creates a new consumer protection agency, something republicans had little enthusiasm for.

It would impose new restraints on the largest, most interconnected banks. It would  demand proof that borrowers could pay for the simplest of mortgages.

"Our goal is not to punish the banks but to protect the larger economy and the American people from the kind of upheavals that we've seen in the past few years," Obama said earlier Thursday after the Senate cleared a key 60-vote hurdle blocking final action.

Obama said, the fiancial industry had tried to stop the new regulations "with hordes of lobbyists and millions of dollars in ads."

Only two Democrats voted against the bill. Four Republicans broke ranks with their party to support it.

"The decisions we've made will have an impact on the lives of Americans for decades to come," said Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., who voted against the legislation. "Judgment will not be rendered by self-congratulatory press releases, but, rather, by the marketplace. And the marketplace does not give credit for good intentions."
 
Democrats argued the bill  was a potent response to the financial abuses, regulatory weaknesses and consumer misjudgments that plunged the nation deep into recession.
"To Wall Street, it says: No longer can you recklessly gamble away other people's money," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "It says the days of too big to fail are behind us. It says to those who game the system: The game is over."

As House and Senate negotiators meet to work out differences in the bills, the common ground between the two bills will likely tilt toward making the bill tougher on banks rather than weaker.

See the complete story at: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=10696150

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu 
Netcraft rank: 8301 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com



Monday, April 19, 2010

Zogby Interactive: Most Americans Support Stronger Regulations on Big Banks

Zogby International


UTICA, New York - Legislative proposals to regulate financial institutions and limit their size have the support of a majority of likely voters, including 55% who favor a tax on large banks to cover any government losses from bailouts.

Those are among the findings of a Zogby Interactive survey of 3,351 likely voters conducted from April 1-3, 2010. The survey has a margin of error of +/-1.7%.

The survey also found that 63% do not agree that the federal government has a responsibility to insure that big banks do not fail and only 33% said they had confidence in the Federal Reserve to enforce regulations on the nation's financial institutions.

The Democrats should be able to beat the Republicans silly if they try to filibuster Wall Street reform in the US Senate.The public support the Democrats on this issue.

See the complete survey at http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1845

feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Netcraft rank: 7963 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com



Friday, August 28, 2009

Comedy Central: MBA Ethics Oath

John Oliver enlists the help of a former convict to convince business students to sign an ethics oath.

It's a sad statement that students are unable to commit to such a generic oath. Schools should insist student's sign this oath before they are admitted to an MBA program.


click graphic to enlarge


The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
MBA Ethics Oath
www.thedailyshow.com

Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests

Get 30 days of free traffic analysis simply by going to Web-Stat: http://www.web-stat.com/?id=2955

Subscribe to the Rightardia feed: feeds.feedburner.com/blogspot/IGiu

Improve blog traffic with TrafficG http://trafficg.com/splash/splash01.php?uid=eelder1

Netcraft rank: 12834 http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=6C2826218226DBAE131D0E5D3916#12834